Literature DB >> 20526285

Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates.

Irini A Scordi-Bello1, Thomas H Kalb, Patrick A Lento.   

Abstract

Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively (P=0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526285     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  11 in total

1.  Description of in-hospital deaths in Vienna during 1850-2000.

Authors:  Doris Höflmayer; Eduard Winter; Thomas Wasserscheid; Katalin Vig-Kuna; Walter Feigl
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  Zygomycosis Associated with HIV Infection and Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Larry Nichols; Rebecca Z Ocque; Ivonne Daly
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-01-23

3.  Synergism of verbal autopsy and diagnostic pathology autopsy for improved accuracy of mortality data.

Authors:  Corinne L Fligner; Jill Murray; Drucilla J Roberts
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 4.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Computerized Tomography Scanning and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Will Terminate the Era of the Autopsy - A Hypothesis.

Authors:  Daniel Benharroch; Shifra Shvarts; Alan Jotkowitz; Ilan Shelef
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Postmortem CT is more accurate than clinical diagnosis for identifying the immediate cause of death in hospitalized patients: a prospective autopsy-based study.

Authors:  Kunihiro Inai; Sakon Noriki; Kazuyuki Kinoshita; Toyohiko Sakai; Hirohiko Kimura; Akihiko Nishijima; Hiromichi Iwasaki; Hironobu Naiki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Annick C Weustink; M G Myriam Hunink; J Wolter Oosterhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pathophysiology and the Monitoring Methods for Cardiac Arrest Associated Brain Injury.

Authors:  Cesar Reis; Onat Akyol; Camila Araujo; Lei Huang; Budbazar Enkhjargal; Jay Malaguit; Vadim Gospodarev; John H Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  C A Early; M G F Gilliland; K L Kelly; W R Oliver; P J Kragel
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2019-02-12

10.  Autopsy kidneys: an overlooked resource.

Authors:  Kammi J Henriksen
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.