Literature DB >> 20526272

Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction.

José Barreiro-Torres1, Marcio Diniz-Freitas, Lucía Lago-Méndez, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José-Manuel Gándara-Rey, Abel García-García.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the surgical difficulty of lower third molar extraction facilitates the design of treatment plans by minimizing complications and improving the preparation of patients and assistants in terms of the postoperative management of inflammation and pain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the value of panoramic radiographs in predicting lower third molar extraction difficulty and technique and to determine if the experience of the practitioner had any influence on this predictive ability. Fourteen dental practitioners with varying levels of experience evaluate the difficulty of lower third molar extraction in a group of patients using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a modified version of a surgical difficulty scale. The results were then compared to postoperative scores calculated using the same scale. A tendency to underestimate the difficulty of procedures that was more pronounced in observers with greater levels of experience was observed. A low level of agreement between preoperative and postoperative evaluations using the surgical difficulty scale as well as an association between difficulty assessed preoperatively using the VAS and difficulty assessed postoperatively using the surgical difficulty scale was also found. The use of panoramic radiographs does not allow practitioners to accurately predict lower third molar extraction difficulty and technique, regardless of their level of experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526272     DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  9 in total

1.  A Preliminary Study on the Effects of Self-Reported Dietary Caffeine on Pain Experience and Postoperative Analgesia.

Authors:  Nirmani P Karunathilake; Reginald F Frye; Mary F Stavropoulos; Mary A Herman; Barbara A Hastie
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2012-12

2.  Evaluation capability of surgical difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a retrospective study from a post-graduate institution.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

3.  Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars.

Authors:  C-J Lima; L-C-F Silva; M-R-S Melo; J-A-S-S Santos; T-S Santos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 4.  Review of Difficulty Indices for Removal of Impacted Third Molars and a New Classification of Difficulty Indices.

Authors:  Sonal Priya Bhansali; Sumit Bhansali; Archit Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

5.  Predictive factors of difficulty in lower third molar extraction: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Alvira-González; R Figueiredo; E Valmaseda-Castellón; C Quesada-Gómez; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty.

Authors:  A-A Al-Samman
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-11-01

7.  Assessment of postoperative discomfort and nerve injuries after surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study.

Authors:  Surendra N Daware; Ramdas Balakrishna; Suryakant C Deogade; Yogesh S Ingole; Sushant M Patil; Dinesh M Naitam
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 8.  Pain measurement in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Nattapong Sirintawat; Kamonpun Sawang; Teeranut Chaiyasamut; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-12-28

9.  Third molar surgical difficulty scales: systematic review and preoperative assessment form.

Authors:  C Gay-Escoda; A Sánchez-Torres; J Borrás-Ferreres; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-01-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.