OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of BI 2536, a novel polo-like kinase-1 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS:Ninety-five patients were randomized to intravenous BI 2536 on day 1 (200 mg) or days 1 to 3 (50 or 60 mg) of a 21-day treatment course. BI 2536 doses were escalated beyond course 2 if well tolerated. The primary objective was response, and the secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), quality of life, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Primary statistical aim was to demonstrate the difference in objective response rate to historical placebo for both treatment groups. RESULTS: Four patients (4.2%) had a partial response; two were confirmed by independent review. Median PFS was 8.3 weeks (58 days 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48-85) and 7 weeks (49 days 95% CI: 46-70) assessed by investigator and independent review, respectively. Median OS was 28.7 weeks (201 days 95% CI: 180-305). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment schedules regarding clinical benefit, PFS, or OS. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients; common nonhematologic adverse events were fatigue (31%) and nausea (27%). Two deaths (pulmonary hemorrhage and sepsis) were considered drug related. There was a trend in favor of the days 1 to 3 dosing schedule in quality of life. BI 2536 displayed moderate interpatient variability. CONCLUSIONS: BI 2536 monotherapy has modest efficacy and favorable safety in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. The findings support the further development of polo-like kinase-1 inhibitors within this indication.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of BI 2536, a novel polo-like kinase-1 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Ninety-five patients were randomized to intravenous BI 2536 on day 1 (200 mg) or days 1 to 3 (50 or 60 mg) of a 21-day treatment course. BI 2536 doses were escalated beyond course 2 if well tolerated. The primary objective was response, and the secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), quality of life, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Primary statistical aim was to demonstrate the difference in objective response rate to historical placebo for both treatment groups. RESULTS: Four patients (4.2%) had a partial response; two were confirmed by independent review. Median PFS was 8.3 weeks (58 days 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48-85) and 7 weeks (49 days 95% CI: 46-70) assessed by investigator and independent review, respectively. Median OS was 28.7 weeks (201 days 95% CI: 180-305). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment schedules regarding clinical benefit, PFS, or OS. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients; common nonhematologic adverse events were fatigue (31%) and nausea (27%). Two deaths (pulmonary hemorrhage and sepsis) were considered drug related. There was a trend in favor of the days 1 to 3 dosing schedule in quality of life. BI 2536 displayed moderate interpatient variability. CONCLUSIONS:BI 2536 monotherapy has modest efficacy and favorable safety in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. The findings support the further development of polo-like kinase-1 inhibitors within this indication.
Authors: Michel D Wissing; Janet Mendonca; Madeleine S Q Kortenhorst; Nadine S Kaelber; Matthew Gonzalez; Eunice Kim; Hans Hammers; Paul J van Diest; Michael A Carducci; Sushant K Kachhap Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ming Zhang; Ratnakar Singh; Shaohua Peng; Tuhina Mazumdar; Vaishnavi Sambandam; Li Shen; Pan Tong; Lerong Li; Nene N Kalu; Curtis R Pickering; Mitchell Frederick; Jeffrey N Myers; Jing Wang; Faye M Johnson Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Renata Ferrarotto; Ruchitha Goonatilake; Suk Young Yoo; Pan Tong; Uma Giri; Shaohua Peng; John Minna; Luc Girard; Yuehong Wang; Liguang Wang; Lerong Li; Lixia Diao; David H Peng; Don L Gibbons; Bonnie S Glisson; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren A Byers; Faye M Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Uma D Vempati; Caty Chung; Chris Mader; Amar Koleti; Nakul Datar; Dušica Vidović; David Wrobel; Sean Erickson; Jeremy L Muhlich; Gabriel Berriz; Cyril H Benes; Aravind Subramanian; Ajay Pillai; Caroline E Shamu; Stephan C Schürer Journal: J Biomol Screen Date: 2014-02-11
Authors: Shirley L Markant; Lourdes Adriana Esparza; Jesse Sun; Kelly L Barton; Lisa M McCoig; Gerald A Grant; John R Crawford; Michael L Levy; Paul A Northcott; David Shih; Marc Remke; Michael D Taylor; Robert J Wechsler-Reya Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mei Hong; Mingqiang Ren; Jeane Silva; Thomas Kennedy; Justin Choi; John K Cowell; Zhonglin Hao Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 6.166