BACKGROUND: Treatment with dasatinib, a highly potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, has resulted in high rates of complete cytogenetic response and progression-free survival among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase, after failure of imatinib treatment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dasatinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. METHODS: In a multinational study, 519 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib at a dose of 100 mg once daily (259 patients) or imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once daily (260 patients). The primary end point was complete cytogenetic response by 12 months, confirmed on two consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart. Secondary end points, including major molecular response, were tested at a significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months, the rate of confirmed complete cytogenetic response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (77% vs. 66%, P=0.007), as was the rate of complete cytogenetic response observed on at least one assessment (83% vs. 72%, P=0.001). The rate of major molecular response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (46% vs. 28%, P<0.0001), and responses were achieved in a shorter time with dasatinib (P<0.0001). Progression to the accelerated or blastic phase of CML occurred in 5 patients who were receiving dasatinib (1.9%) and in 9 patients who were receiving imatinib (3.5%). The safety profiles of the two treatments were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Dasatinib, administered once daily, as compared with imatinib, administered once daily, induced significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response. Since achieving complete cytogenetic response within 12 months has been associated with better long-term, progression-free survival, dasatinib may improve the long-term outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00481247.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment with dasatinib, a highly potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, has resulted in high rates of complete cytogenetic response and progression-free survival among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase, after failure of imatinib treatment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dasatinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. METHODS: In a multinational study, 519 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib at a dose of 100 mg once daily (259 patients) or imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once daily (260 patients). The primary end point was complete cytogenetic response by 12 months, confirmed on two consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart. Secondary end points, including major molecular response, were tested at a significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months, the rate of confirmed complete cytogenetic response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (77% vs. 66%, P=0.007), as was the rate of complete cytogenetic response observed on at least one assessment (83% vs. 72%, P=0.001). The rate of major molecular response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (46% vs. 28%, P<0.0001), and responses were achieved in a shorter time with dasatinib (P<0.0001). Progression to the accelerated or blastic phase of CML occurred in 5 patients who were receiving dasatinib (1.9%) and in 9 patients who were receiving imatinib (3.5%). The safety profiles of the two treatments were similar. CONCLUSIONS:Dasatinib, administered once daily, as compared with imatinib, administered once daily, induced significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response. Since achieving complete cytogenetic response within 12 months has been associated with better long-term, progression-free survival, dasatinib may improve the long-term outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00481247.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Adrian Marino-Enriquez; Ajia Presnell; Rachel S Donsky; Diana J Griffith; Arin McKinley; Janice Patterson; Takahiro Taguchi; Cher-Wei Liang; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: A A Mian; A Rafiei; I Haberbosch; A Zeifman; I Titov; V Stroylov; A Metodieva; O Stroganov; F Novikov; B Brill; G Chilov; D Hoelzer; O G Ottmann; M Ruthardt Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Neil P Shah; Jorge E Cortes; Michele Baccarani; Mohan B Agarwal; María Soledad Undurraga; Jianxiang Wang; Juan Julio Kassack Ipiña; Dong-Wook Kim; Michinori Ogura; Carolina Pavlovsky; Christian Junghanss; Jorge H Milone; Franck E Nicolini; Tadeusz Robak; Jan Van Droogenbroeck; Edo Vellenga; M Brigid Bradley-Garelik; Chao Zhu; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: Blood Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hengyu Lu; Nicole Villafane; Turgut Dogruluk; Caitlin L Grzeskowiak; Kathleen Kong; Yiu Huen Tsang; Oksana Zagorodna; Angeliki Pantazi; Lixing Yang; Nicholas J Neill; Young Won Kim; Chad J Creighton; Roel G Verhaak; Gordon B Mills; Peter J Park; Raju Kucherlapati; Kenneth L Scott Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 12.701