Literature DB >> 20525595

Experimental design in caecilian systematics: phylogenetic information of mitochondrial genomes and nuclear rag1.

Diego San Mauro1, David J Gower, Tim Massingham, Mark Wilkinson, Rafael Zardoya, James A Cotton.   

Abstract

In molecular phylogenetic studies, a major aspect of experimental design concerns the choice of markers and taxa. Although previous studies have investigated the phylogenetic performance of different genes and the effectiveness of increasing taxon sampling, their conclusions are partly contradictory, probably because they are highly context specific and dependent on the group of organisms used in each study. Goldman introduced a method for experimental design in phylogenetics based on the expected information to be gained that has barely been used in practice. Here we use this method to explore the phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial (mt) genes, mt genomes, and nuclear rag1 for studies of the systematics of caecilian amphibians, as well as the effect of taxon addition on the stabilization of a controversial branch of the tree. Overall phylogenetic information estimates per gene, specific estimates per branch of the tree, estimates for combined (mitogenomic) data sets, and estimates as a hypothetical new taxon is added to different parts of the caecilian tree are calculated and compared. In general, the most informative data sets are those for mt transfer and ribosomal RNA genes. Our results also show at which positions in the caecilian tree the addition of taxa have the greatest potential to increase phylogenetic information with respect to the controversial relationships of Scolecomorphus, Boulengerula, and all other teresomatan caecilians. These positions are, as intuitively expected, mostly (but not all) adjacent to the controversial branch. Generating whole mitogenomic and rag1 data for additional taxa joining the Scolecomorphus branch may be a more efficient strategy than sequencing a similar amount of additional nucleotides spread across the current caecilian taxon sampling. The methodology employed in this study allows an a priori evaluation and testable predictions of the appropriateness of particular experimental designs to solve specific questions at different levels of the caecilian phylogeny.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20525595     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  10 in total

1.  Estimating Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content.

Authors:  Paul O Lewis; Ming-Hui Chen; Lynn Kuo; Louise A Lewis; Karolina Fučíková; Suman Neupane; Yu-Bo Wang; Daoyuan Shi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  What are the consequences of combining nuclear and mitochondrial data for phylogenetic analysis? Lessons from Plethodon salamanders and 13 other vertebrate clades.

Authors:  M Caitlin Fisher-Reid; John J Wiens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Performance of single and concatenated sets of mitochondrial genes at inferring metazoan relationships relative to full mitogenome data.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Scott R Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  dCITE: Measuring Necessary Cladistic Information Can Help You Reduce Polytomy Artefacts in Trees.

Authors:  Michael J Wise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  How many species and under what names? Using DNA barcoding and GenBank data for west Central African amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Jessica L Deichmann; Daniel G Mulcahy; Hadrien Vanthomme; Elie Tobi; Addison H Wynn; Breda M Zimkus; Roy W McDiarmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The influence of molecular markers and methods on inferring the phylogenetic relationships between the representatives of the Arini (parrots, Psittaciformes), determined on the basis of their complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Adam Dawid Urantowka; Aleksandra Kroczak; Paweł Mackiewicz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 7.  Molecular systematics: A synthesis of the common methods and the state of knowledge.

Authors:  Diego San Mauro; Ainhoa Agorreta
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.787

8.  Phylogeny and evolutionary patterns in the Dwarf crayfish subfamily (Decapoda: Cambarellinae).

Authors:  Carlos Pedraza-Lara; Ignacio Doadrio; Jesse W Breinholt; Keith A Crandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Next-Generation Mitogenomics: A Comparison of Approaches Applied to Caecilian Amphibian Phylogeny.

Authors:  Simon T Maddock; Andrew G Briscoe; Mark Wilkinson; Andrea Waeschenbach; Diego San Mauro; Julia J Day; D Tim J Littlewood; Peter G Foster; Ronald A Nussbaum; David J Gower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships within Passeriformes Based on Mitochondrial Genes and Inferring the Evolution of Their Mitogenomes in Terms of Duplications.

Authors:  Paweł Mackiewicz; Adam Dawid Urantówka; Aleksandra Kroczak; Dorota Mackiewicz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.