Literature DB >> 20525586

Testing the impact of miniaturization on phylogeny: Paleozoic dissorophoid amphibians.

Nadia B Fröbisch1, Rainer R Schoch.   

Abstract

Among the diverse clade of Paleozoic dissorophoid amphibians, the small, terrestrial amphibamids and the neotenic branchiosaurids have frequently been suggested as possible antecedents of either all or some of the modern amphibian clades. Classically, amphibamids and branchiosaurids have been considered to represent distinct, but closely related clades within dissorophoids, but despite their importance for the controversial lissamphibian origins, a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of small dissorophoids has thus far not been attempted. On the basis of an integrated data set, the relationships of amphibamids and branchiosaurids were analyzed using parsimony and Bayesian approaches. Both groups represent miniaturized forms and it was tested whether similar developmental pathways, associated with miniaturization, lead to an artificial close relationship of branchiosaurids and amphibamids. Moreover, the fit of the resulting tree topologies to the distribution of fossil taxa in the stratigraphic rock record was assessed as an additional source of information. The results show that characters associated with a miniaturized morphology are not responsible for the close clustering of branchiosaurids and amphibamids. Instead, all analyses invariably demonstrate a monophyletic clade of branchiosaurids highly nested within derived amphibamids, indicating that branchiosaurids represent a group of secondarily neotenic amphibamid dissorophoids. This understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of small dissorophoid amphibians provides a new framework for the discussion of their evolutionary history and the evolution of characters shared by branchiosaurids and/or amphibamids with modern amphibian taxa.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20525586     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  9 in total

1.  New material of the 'microsaur' Llistrofus from the cave deposits of Richards Spur, Oklahoma and the paleoecology of the Hapsidopareiidae.

Authors:  Bryan M Gee; Joseph J Bevitt; Ulf Garbe; Robert R Reisz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Palatal morphology predicts the paleobiology of early salamanders.

Authors:  Jia Jia; Guangzhao Li; Ke-Qin Gao
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Body size evolution in extant Oryzomyini rodents: Cope's rule or miniaturization?

Authors:  Jorge Avaria-Llautureo; Cristián E Hernández; Dusan Boric-Bargetto; Cristian B Canales-Aguirre; Bryan Morales-Pallero; Enrique Rodríguez-Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Early evolution of limb regeneration in tetrapods: evidence from a 300-million-year-old amphibian.

Authors:  Nadia B Fröbisch; Constanze Bickelmann; Florian Witzmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mosasauroid phylogeny under multiple phylogenetic methods provides new insights on the evolution of aquatic adaptations in the group.

Authors:  Tiago R Simões; Oksana Vernygora; Ilaria Paparella; Paulina Jimenez-Huidobro; Michael W Caldwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Braincase simplification and the origin of lissamphibians.

Authors:  Jade B Atkins; Robert R Reisz; Hillary C Maddin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Convergence, divergence, and macroevolutionary constraint as revealed by anatomical network analysis of the squamate skull, with an emphasis on snakes.

Authors:  Catherine R C Strong; Mark D Scherz; Michael W Caldwell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Vertebral Development in Paleozoic and Mesozoic Tetrapods Revealed by Paleohistological Data.

Authors:  Marylène Danto; Florian Witzmann; Nadia B Fröbisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Can We Reliably Calibrate Deep Nodes in the Tetrapod Tree? Case Studies in Deep Tetrapod Divergences.

Authors:  Jason D Pardo; Kendra Lennie; Jason S Anderson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.