Literature DB >> 20525281

Prediction of GTP interacting residues, dipeptides and tripeptides in a protein from its evolutionary information.

Jagat S Chauhan1, Nitish K Mishra, Gajendra P S Raghava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins play an important role in regulation of G-protein. Thus prediction of GTP interacting residues in a protein is one of the major challenges in the field of the computational biology. In this study, an attempt has been made to develop a computational method for predicting GTP interacting residues in a protein with high accuracy (Acc), precision (Prec) and recall (Rc). RESULT: All the models developed in this study have been trained and tested on a non-redundant (40% similarity) dataset using five-fold cross-validation. Firstly, we have developed neural network based models using single sequence and PSSM profile and achieved maximum Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) 0.24 (Acc 61.30%) and 0.39 (Acc 68.88%) respectively. Secondly, we have developed a support vector machine (SVM) based models using single sequence and PSSM profile and achieved maximum MCC 0.37 (Prec 0.73, Rc 0.57, Acc 67.98%) and 0.55 (Prec 0.80, Rc 0.73, Acc 77.17%) respectively. In this work, we have introduced a new concept of predicting GTP interacting dipeptide (two consecutive GTP interacting residues) and tripeptide (three consecutive GTP interacting residues) for the first time. We have developed SVM based model for predicting GTP interacting dipeptides using PSSM profile and achieved MCC 0.64 with precision 0.87, recall 0.74 and accuracy 81.37%. Similarly, SVM based model have been developed for predicting GTP interacting tripeptides using PSSM profile and achieved MCC 0.70 with precision 0.93, recall 0.73 and accuracy 83.98%.
CONCLUSION: These results show that PSSM based method performs better than single sequence based method. The prediction models based on dipeptides or tripeptides are more accurate than the traditional model based on single residue. A web server "GTPBinder" http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/gtpbinder/ based on above models has been developed for predicting GTP interacting residues in a protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20525281      PMCID: PMC3098072          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of protein structural classes by support vector machines.

Authors:  Yu-Dong Cai; Xiao-Jun Liu; Xue-biao Xu; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  2002-02

2.  On the molecular discrimination between adenine and guanine by proteins.

Authors:  I Nobeli; R A Laskowski; W S Valdar; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Prediction of beta-turns in proteins from multiple alignment using neural network.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Gajendra Pal Singh Raghava
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information.

Authors:  Shandar Ahmad; M Michael Gromiha; Akinori Sarai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  The P-loop--a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins.

Authors:  M Saraste; P R Sibbald; A Wittinghofer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Identification of ATP binding residues of a protein from its primary sequence.

Authors:  Jagat S Chauhan; Nitish K Mishra; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Mutations in the GTP-binding site of GS alpha alter stimulation of adenylyl cyclase.

Authors:  S B Masters; R T Miller; M H Chi; F H Chang; B Beiderman; N G Lopez; H R Bourne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Activation and attenuation of adenylate cyclase. The role of GTP-binding proteins as macromolecular messengers in receptor--cyclase coupling.

Authors:  L E Limbird
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1981-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Electrostatic potential of nucleotide-free protein is sufficient for discrimination between adenine and guanine-specific binding sites.

Authors:  Gautam Basu; Dakshanamurthy Sivanesan; Takeshi Kawabata; Nobuhiro Go
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold.

Authors:  J E Walker; M Saraste; M J Runswick; N J Gay
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  23 in total

1.  Prediction of heme binding residues from protein sequences with integrative sequence profiles.

Authors:  Yi Xiong; Juan Liu; Wen Zhang; Tao Zeng
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  HemeBIND: a novel method for heme binding residue prediction by combining structural and sequence information.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Jianjun Hu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  TANGLE: two-level support vector regression approach for protein backbone torsion angle prediction from primary sequences.

Authors:  Jiangning Song; Hao Tan; Mingjun Wang; Geoffrey I Webb; Tatsuya Akutsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  GlycoPP: a webserver for prediction of N- and O-glycosites in prokaryotic protein sequences.

Authors:  Jagat S Chauhan; Adil H Bhat; Gajendra P S Raghava; Alka Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting flavin and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-binding sites in proteins using the fragment transformation method.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Lu; Chin-Sheng Yu; Yu-Feng Lin; Jin-Yi Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Hybrid approach for predicting coreceptor used by HIV-1 from its V3 loop amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  In silico platform for prediction of N-, O- and C-glycosites in eukaryotic protein sequences.

Authors:  Jagat Singh Chauhan; Alka Rao; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of vitamin interacting residues in a vitamin binding protein using evolutionary information.

Authors:  Bharat Panwar; Sudheer Gupta; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Nucleos: a web server for the identification of nucleotide-binding sites in protein structures.

Authors:  Luca Parca; Fabrizio Ferré; Gabriele Ausiello; Manuela Helmer-Citterich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Identification of nucleotide-binding sites in protein structures: a novel approach based on nucleotide modularity.

Authors:  Luca Parca; Pier Federico Gherardini; Mauro Truglio; Iolanda Mangone; Fabrizio Ferrè; Manuela Helmer-Citterich; Gabriele Ausiello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.