| Literature DB >> 20525246 |
Laura Fiammenghi1, Valentina Ancarani, Tilman Rosales, Jay R Knutson, Massimiliano Petrini, Anna Maria Granato, Elena Pancisi, Laura Ridolfi, Ruggero Ridolfi, Angela Riccobon, Paolo Neyroz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antigen processing by dendritic cells (DC) exposed to specific stimuli has been well characterized in biological studies. Nonetheless, the question of whether autologous whole tumor lysates (as used in clinical trials) are similarly processed by these cells has not yet been resolved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20525246 PMCID: PMC2894751 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1Experimental plan and fluorescence images. (A) Scheme of the experimental plan. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of ATL. Proteins gel electrophoresis separation was run on acrylamide gradient (4%-20%). The ATL sample is shown after Coomassie brilliant Blue staining of the proteins bands (lane 1) and by UV transillumination, before staining of the proteins bands, to reveal the extent of the fluorescence labelling (lane 2). (C) FRET analysis of mDC loaded with Alexa488-labeled ATL and immunolabelled with HLA-DR(HL12) mAb and Alexa546-conjugated IgG. The upper panels refer to the sample analyzed at 16 hours after the maturation stimulus and the lower panels refer to the sample analyzed at 46 hours after the maturation stimulus. Panels are divided in sets of images acquired before and after acceptor photobleaching (see Materials and Methods). Donor images were acquired in the green channel (a, h, d and k) and acceptor images were acquired in the red channel (b, i, e and l). White arrows (e and l) indicate the bleached regions. The relative merged images are also shown (c, j, f and m). FRET efficiency was calculated using eq. 1 and the results are presented as pseudo-color images (g and n).
mDC FRET efficiency measured 16 hr and 46 hr after maturation stimulus
| mDC 16 hr | ROI 1 | ROI 2 | ROI 3 | ROI 4 | ROI 5 | ROI 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | 23 | 26 | 25 | 29 | 46 | |
| 34 | 23 | 25 | 26 | 28 | 45 | |
| 46 | 59 | 60 | 47 | 35 | 74 | |
| 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 33 | 72 | |
| 2.94 | 0 | 0 | 3.85 | 0 | 0 | |
| 31 | 45 | 43 | 41 | 37 | 44 | |
| 36 | 62 | 52 | 49 | 37 | 42 | |
| 56 | 142 | 132 | 142 | 139 | 133 | |
| 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 141 | 139 | |
| 13.9 | 27.4 | 17.3 | 16.3 | 0 | 0 | |
ROI, Region of interest; Pre, before photobleaching; Post, after photobleaching; mDC 16 or 46 hr, Dendritic Cells matured for 16 or 46 hr; E (%), Energy Transfer Efficiency. The data shown refer to six significant ROIs of the experiments reported in Figure 1A. ROI1 to ROI4 represent regions selected within the bleached area, whereas ROI5 and ROI6 represent regions selected outside the bleached area, which were used as controls. The numbers in the "Donor" and the "Acceptor" rows indicate the fluorescence intensity levels detected in each ROI.
Figure 2FRET measurements. (A) Averaged FRET efficiency of mDC as a function of time from the maturation stimulus. The data and the Standard Errors (±SE) refer to FRET measurements performed over at least three fields for each sample (n = 3-5) and different ROIs (n = 30-55) inside the bleached regions. The x axis displays the time in culture after maturation stimulus. (B) Plot of the independence of E% from acceptor levels. The data shown were generated from image measurements 22 hr after maturation. The acceptor levels refer to the intensity of the image acquired before acceptor photobleaching and analyzed versus the recovered E%, on a pixel by pixel basis.