A Litva1, C S Robinson, D C Archer. 1. School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB.
Abstract
REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Crib-biting/windsucking behaviour has important consequences for equine health and welfare. Lay perceptions of health and illness are of interest to medical sociologists, providing important information to medical practitioners, but have infrequently been applied in veterinary research. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate how lay epidemiology can be applied within veterinary research by exploring the lay perceptions regarding the causes of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour in horses. METHODS: Informants were recruited from professional and amateur horse owners who had or had not owned/cared for a horse that exhibited crib-biting/windsucking behaviour. In-depth interviews were used to examine perceptions about the development of this behaviour within each group until a 'saturation' of themes emerged. RESULTS: The main themes that emerged as causes of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour were 'boredom', 'stress' and 'habit/addiction'. In the group of owners/carers who did not have direct experience of this type of behaviour, 'copying' from other horses emerged as a strong theme and they stated that they would not wish to own a crib-biting/windsucking horse. In contrast, those who had direct experience of horses demonstrating this behaviour did not believe copying was a cause based on their own observations and would not be put off purchasing or caring for another horse displaying this behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions about what causes crib-biting/windsucking was influenced by whether or not informants had personal experience of horses demonstrating this behaviour. The three main themes that emerged have some justification based on current research and highlight the need for further investigation into the underlying pathophysiology of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Qualitative approaches to health, disease and behaviour have an important role in the medical field and are applicable to veterinary research.
REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Crib-biting/windsucking behaviour has important consequences for equine health and welfare. Lay perceptions of health and illness are of interest to medical sociologists, providing important information to medical practitioners, but have infrequently been applied in veterinary research. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate how lay epidemiology can be applied within veterinary research by exploring the lay perceptions regarding the causes of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour in horses. METHODS: Informants were recruited from professional and amateur horse owners who had or had not owned/cared for a horse that exhibited crib-biting/windsucking behaviour. In-depth interviews were used to examine perceptions about the development of this behaviour within each group until a 'saturation' of themes emerged. RESULTS: The main themes that emerged as causes of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour were 'boredom', 'stress' and 'habit/addiction'. In the group of owners/carers who did not have direct experience of this type of behaviour, 'copying' from other horses emerged as a strong theme and they stated that they would not wish to own a crib-biting/windsucking horse. In contrast, those who had direct experience of horses demonstrating this behaviour did not believe copying was a cause based on their own observations and would not be put off purchasing or caring for another horse displaying this behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions about what causes crib-biting/windsucking was influenced by whether or not informants had personal experience of horses demonstrating this behaviour. The three main themes that emerged have some justification based on current research and highlight the need for further investigation into the underlying pathophysiology of crib-biting/windsucking behaviour. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Qualitative approaches to health, disease and behaviour have an important role in the medical field and are applicable to veterinary research.
Authors: Helen R Whay; Amit K Dikshit; Jo Hockenhull; Richard M A Parker; Anindo Banerjee; Sue I Hughes; Joy C Pritchard; Christine E Reix Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claire E Scantlebury; Elizabeth Perkins; Gina L Pinchbeck; Debra C Archer; Robert M Christley Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 2.741