Literature DB >> 20524905

Competing risk analysis of events 10 years after revascularization.

Tor Melberg1, Ottar Kjell Nygård, Karel Kier-Jan Kuiper, Jan Erik Nordrehaug.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of competing risk (CR) non-cardiac death during long-term follow-up of revascularized patients on the interpretation of the cardiac outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospectively, we compared outcomes estimated with the Kaplan-Meier and the cumulative incidence function (CIF) methods after a median 10.8 years follow-up in 1,234 consecutive patients (594 CABG, 640 PCI) undergoing first time non-emergent revascularization in a community cohort.
RESULTS: Overall 301 (24.4%) patients died (27.3% in the CABG vs. 21.7% in the PCI group, p = 0.02). The causes of death were cardiac (10.3%) and non-cardiac (14.1%). CR analysis showed a similar probability of cardiac death (CIF 0.10 (95% CI 0.092, 0.18) vs. 0.093 (0.07, 0.12)) in the CABG and PCI treated patients, respectively. The probability for acute myocardial infarction (CIF 0.12 vs. 0.16 p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (CIF 0.15 vs. 0.09 p = 0.007) in the CABG and PCI group respectively, differed. The differences were also statistically significant after multivariate adjustment for the competing risks of death. For all outcomes the Kaplan-Meier method overestimated risk estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: The competing risk adjusted probability for cardiac death, but not other cardiac endpoints are comparable in patients treated with either CABG or PCI after very long-term follow-up. The risk for all-cause death was mainly predicted by the occurrence of non-cardiac diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524905     DOI: 10.3109/14017431003698531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1401-7431            Impact factor:   1.589


  3 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.

Authors:  Maryam Farhadian; Sahar Dehdar Karsidani; Azadeh Mozayanimonfared; Hossein Mahjub
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Effect of competing mortality risks on predictive performance of the QRISK3 cardiovascular risk prediction tool in older people and those with comorbidity: external validation population cohort study.

Authors:  Shona Livingstone; Daniel R Morales; Peter T Donnan; Katherine Payne; Alexander J Thompson; Ji-Hee Youn; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2021-06

3.  Competing Risk Analysis for Evaluation of Dalteparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Guowei Li; Deborah J Cook; Mitchell A H Levine; Gordon Guyatt; Mark Crowther; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Anne Holbrook; Francois Lamontagne; Stephen D Walter; Niall D Ferguson; Simon Finfer; Yaseen M Arabi; Rinaldo Bellomo; D Jamie Cooper; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.