Literature DB >> 20524744

An investigation of the NOCSAE linear impactor test method based on in vivo measures of head impact acceleration in American football.

Joseph T Gwin1, Jeffery J Chu, Solomon G Diamond, P David Halstead, Joseph J Crisco, Richard M Greenwald.   

Abstract

The performance characteristics of football helmets are currently evaluated by simulating head impacts in the laboratory using a linear drop test method. To encourage development of helmets designed to protect against concussion, the National Operating Committee for Standards in Athletic Equipment recently proposed a new headgear testing methodology with the goal of more closely simulating in vivo head impacts. This proposed test methodology involves an impactor striking a helmeted headform, which is attached to a nonrigid neck. The purpose of the present study was to compare headform accelerations recorded according to the current (n=30) and proposed (n=54) laboratory test methodologies to head accelerations recorded in the field during play. In-helmet systems of six single-axis accelerometers were worn by the Dartmouth College men's football team during the 2005 and 2006 seasons (n=20,733 impacts; 40 players). The impulse response characteristics of a subset of laboratory test impacts (n=27) were compared with the impulse response characteristics of a matched sample of in vivo head accelerations (n=24). Second- and third-order underdamped, conventional, continuous-time process models were developed for each impact. These models were used to characterize the linear head/headform accelerations for each impact based on frequency domain parameters. Headform linear accelerations generated according to the proposed test method were less similar to in vivo head accelerations than headform accelerations generated by the current linear drop test method. The nonrigid neck currently utilized was not developed to simulate sport-related direct head impacts and appears to be a source of the discrepancy between frequency characteristics of in vivo and laboratory head/headform accelerations. In vivo impacts occurred 37% more frequently on helmet regions, which are tested in the proposed standard than on helmet regions tested currently. This increase was largely due to the addition of the facemask test location. For the proposed standard, impactor velocities as high as 10.5 m/s were needed to simulate the highest energy impacts recorded in vivo. The knowledge gained from this study may provide the basis for improving sports headgear test apparatuses with regard to mimicking in vivo linear head accelerations. Specifically, increasing the stiffness of the neck is recommended. In addition, this study may provide a basis for selecting appropriate test impact energies for the standard performance specification to accompany the proposed standard linear impactor test method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524744     DOI: 10.1115/1.4000249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  13 in total

Review 1.  Helmets and mouth guards: the role of personal equipment in preventing sport-related concussions.

Authors:  Daniel H Daneshvar; Christine M Baugh; Christopher J Nowinski; Ann C McKee; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.182

2.  Let's get the head further out of the game: a proposal for reducing brain injuries in helmeted contact sports.

Authors:  Joseph J Crisco; Richard M Greenwald
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Resonance of human brain under head acceleration.

Authors:  Kaveh Laksari; Lyndia C Wu; Mehmet Kurt; Calvin Kuo; David C Camarillo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Head-Impact-Measurement Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn L O'Connor; Steven Rowson; Stefan M Duma; Steven P Broglio
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Modified Drop Tower Impact Tests for American Football Helmets.

Authors:  G Alston Rush; R Prabhu; Gus A Rush; Lakiesha N Williams; M F Horstemeyer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  The Influence of Friction Between Football Helmet and Jersey Materials on Force: A Consideration for Sport Safety.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Tina L Claiborne; Gregory B Thompson; Stacey Todaro
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Head Impact Sensor Studies In Sports: A Systematic Review Of Exposure Confirmation Methods.

Authors:  Declan A Patton; Colin M Huber; Divya Jain; Rachel K Myers; Catherine C McDonald; Susan S Margulies; Christina L Master; Kristy B Arbogast
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics.

Authors:  Fidel Hernandez; Peter B Shull; David B Camarillo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Measuring head kinematics in football: correlation between the head impact telemetry system and Hybrid III headform.

Authors:  Jonathan G Beckwith; Richard M Greenwald; Jeffrey J Chu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Head Impact Research Using Inertial Sensors in Sport: A Systematic Review of Methods, Demographics, and Factors Contributing to Exposure.

Authors:  Enora Le Flao; Gunter P Siegmund; Robert Borotkanics
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.