Janet Smylie1, Deshayne Fell, Arne Ohlsson. 1. Centre for Research on Inner City Health (CRICH), St. Michael's Hospital, 70 Richmond Street East, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5C 1 N8. janet.smylie@utoronto.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Joint Working Group on First Nations, Indian, Inuit, and Métis Infant Mortality of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System is a collaboration of national Aboriginal organizations and federal and provincial/territorial stakeholders. Our objective was to better understand what is currently known about Aboriginal infant mortality rates (IMR) in Canada. METHODS: As part of a larger international systematic review of Indigenous IMR calculation, we searched the published literature for original research regarding the calculation of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis infant mortality rates at the national and provincial/territorial level. SYNTHESIS: We identified major deficiencies in the coverage and quality of infant mortality data for Aboriginal populations in Canada. The review of provincial and territorial reporting of infant mortality for Aboriginal populations revealed substantial provincial and territorial variation in the way that birth and death data were collected. With respect to coverage, high-quality IMRs were available only for Status Indians and communities with a high proportion of Inuit residents. No rates were available for Métis or non-Status Indians. CONCLUSION: Striking and persistent disparities persist in the IMRs for Status Indians and in communities with a high proportion of Inuit residents, compared to the general Canadian population. There is an urgent need to work in partnership with First Nations, Indian, Inuit, and Métis stakeholder groups to improve the quality and coverage of Aboriginal IMR information and to acquire information that would help to better understand and address the underlying causes of disparities in infant mortality between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal population in Canada.
OBJECTIVE: The Joint Working Group on First Nations, Indian, Inuit, and Métis Infant Mortality of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System is a collaboration of national Aboriginal organizations and federal and provincial/territorial stakeholders. Our objective was to better understand what is currently known about Aboriginal infant mortality rates (IMR) in Canada. METHODS: As part of a larger international systematic review of Indigenous IMR calculation, we searched the published literature for original research regarding the calculation of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis infant mortality rates at the national and provincial/territorial level. SYNTHESIS: We identified major deficiencies in the coverage and quality of infant mortality data for Aboriginal populations in Canada. The review of provincial and territorial reporting of infant mortality for Aboriginal populations revealed substantial provincial and territorial variation in the way that birth and death data were collected. With respect to coverage, high-quality IMRs were available only for Status Indians and communities with a high proportion of Inuit residents. No rates were available for Métis or non-Status Indians. CONCLUSION: Striking and persistent disparities persist in the IMRs for Status Indians and in communities with a high proportion of Inuit residents, compared to the general Canadian population. There is an urgent need to work in partnership with First Nations, Indian, Inuit, and Métis stakeholder groups to improve the quality and coverage of Aboriginal IMR information and to acquire information that would help to better understand and address the underlying causes of disparities in infant mortality between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal population in Canada.
Authors: Russell Wilkins; Sharanjit Uppal; Philippe Finès; Sacha Senècal; Eric Guimond; Rene Dion Journal: Health Rep Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.796
Authors: L Arbour; C Gilpin; V Millor-Roy; R Platt; G Pekeles; G M Egeland; S Hodgins; P Eydoux Journal: Int J Circumpolar Health Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 1.228
Authors: Kay M Tomashek; Cheng Qin; Jason Hsia; Solomon Iyasu; Wanda D Barfield; Lisa M Flowers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Zhong-Cheng Luo; William J Kierans; Russell Wilkins; Robert M Liston; Soo-Hong Uh; Michael S Kramer Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Laura-Mae Baldwin; David C Grossman; Elise Murowchick; Eric H Larson; Walter B Hollow; Jonathan R Sugarman; William L Freeman; L Gary Hart Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Leslie L Roos; James Bolton; Marni Brownell; Nathan Nickel; Dan Chateau Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-29 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Jane Freemantle; Ian Ring; Teshia G Arambula Solomon; Francine C Gachupin; Janet Smylie; Tessa Louise Cutler; John A Waldon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 9.308