Literature DB >> 2052389

An in-depth study of long-term users of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Implications for clinical use of TENS.

M I Johnson1, C H Ashton, J W Thompson.   

Abstract

This in-depth study examines the relationships between patient, stimulator and outcome variables in a large number of chronic pain patients utilising TENS on a long-term basis. 179 patients completed a TENS questionnaire designed to record age, sex, cause and site of pain and TENS treatment regime. Of these 179 patients, 107 attended our research unit for assessment of the electrical characteristics of TENS during self-administered treatment. Although a remarkable lack of correlation between patient, stimulator and outcome variables was found to exist, the analysis revealed much information of importance: 47% of patients found TENS reduced their pain by more than half; TENS analgesia was rapid both in onset (less than 0.5 h in 75% patients) and in offset (less than 0.5 h in 51% patients); one-third of patients utilised TENS for over 61 h/week; pulse frequencies between 1 and 70 Hz were utilised by 75% of patients; 44% of patients benefitted from burst mode stimulation. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2052389     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90089-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  22 in total

Review 1.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  Amole Khadilkar; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Lucie Brosseau; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 2.  Management strategies for chronic pain.

Authors:  D M Justins
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Auricular electrical stimulation and dental pain threshold.

Authors:  M S Simmons; T D Oleson
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 5.  Visceral chest pain in unstable angina pectoris and effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. (TENS). A review.

Authors:  M Börjesson
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Management of fibromyalgia: what are the best treatment choices?

Authors:  Karin Ø Forseth K; Jan T Gran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Esophageal visceral pain sensitivity: effects of TENS and correlation with manometric findings.

Authors:  M Börjesson; M Pilhall; T Eliasson; H Norssell; C Mannheimer; P Rolny
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Pharmacological treatments for persistent non-malignant pain in older persons.

Authors:  Thorsten Nikolaus; Andrej Zeyfang
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  The use of conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in chronic facial myalgia patients.

Authors:  Ilaria De Giorgi; Tommaso Castroflorio; Barbara Sartoris; Andrea Deregibus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Long term use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at Newcastle Pain Relief Clinic.

Authors:  M I Johnson; C H Ashton; J W Thompson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.