Literature DB >> 20522705

High-resolution solid-state manometry of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters during anesthesia induction: a comparison between obese and non-obese patients.

Alex de Leon1, Sven-Egron Thörn, Magnus Wattwil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically in recent decades. The gastrointestinal changes associated with obesity have clinical significance for the anesthesiologist in the perioperative period. The lower esophageal sphincter and the upper esophageal sphincter play a central role in preventing regurgitation and aspiration. The effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure during anesthesia on the lower esophageal sphincter and the upper esophageal sphincter in obese patients are unknown. In the present study we evaluated, with high-resolution solid-state manometry, the upper esophageal sphincter, lower esophageal sphincter, and barrier pressure (BrP) (lower esophageal pressure--gastric pressure) in obese patients during anesthesia induction and compared them with pressures in non-obese patients.
METHODS: We studied 28 patients, ages 18 to 72 years, 14 with a body mass index > or = 35 kg/m(2), who were undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass, and 14 with a body mass index < or = 30 kg/m(2), who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, using high-resolution solid-state manometry.
RESULTS: Upper esophageal sphincter pressure decreased during anesthesia induction in both groups. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased in both groups during anesthesia induction, and it was significantly lower in obese patients than in non-obese patients. The BrP decreased in both groups and was significantly lower in the obese group than in the non-obese group. The BrP remained positive at all times in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Lower esophageal sphincter and BrPs decreased in both obese and non-obese patients during anesthesia induction, but were significantly lower in obese patients. Although the BrP was significantly lower, it remained positive in all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522705     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1a71f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

Review 1.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Use of the functional luminal imaging probe in pediatrics: A comparison study of patients with achalasia before and after endoscopic dilation and non-achalasia controls.

Authors:  Alain J Benitez; Stephen Budhu; Cassandra Burger; Rossella Turco; Lance Ballester; Amit Shah; Kristle Lynch; Kristin Fiorino; Calies Menard-Katcher; Amanda B Muir; Petar Mamula
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for a patient with a giant hiatal hernia who underwent urological surgery.

Authors:  Mi Kyeong Kim; Junoik Shin; Jeong-Hyun Choi; Hee Yong Kang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Anesthetic management and associated complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A case series.

Authors:  Yuuki Nishihara; Takuya Yoshida; Mayu Ooi; Norihiko Obata; Shinichiro Izuta; Satoshi Mizobuchi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.