P Jellema1, F G Schellevis, D A W M van der Windt, C M F Kneepkens, H E van der Horst. 1. Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care research, VU University Medical Centre and NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When lactose malabsorption gives rise to symptoms, the result is called 'lactose intolerance'. Although lactose intolerance is often bothersome for patients, once recognized it may be managed by simple dietary adjustments. However, diagnosing lactose intolerance is not straightforward, especially in primary care. AIM: To summarize available evidence on the diagnostic performance of gastrointestinal symptoms and self-reported milk (lactose) intolerance in primary care, and the relationship between lactose malabsorption and intolerance. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE and reference screening. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if the design was a primary diagnostic study; the patients were adults consulting because of non-acute abdominal symptoms; the diagnostic test included gastrointestinal symptoms and/or self-reported milk intolerance. A total of 26 primary diagnostic studies were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. They adhered to the most recent guidelines for conducting a diagnostic review as described in the Cochrane Diagnostic Reviewers' Handbook. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence and self-reported milk intolerance was highly variable. A non-Caucasian ethnic origin was associated with the presence of lactose malabsorption. Both lactose malabsorbers and lactose absorbers reported symptoms during the lactose hydrogen breath test. CONCLUSION: Our review shows that high-quality studies on the diagnosis of lactose malabsorption and intolerance in primary care are urgently needed. An important prerequisite would be to clearly define the concept of lactose intolerance, as well as how it should be assessed.
BACKGROUND: When lactose malabsorption gives rise to symptoms, the result is called 'lactose intolerance'. Although lactose intolerance is often bothersome for patients, once recognized it may be managed by simple dietary adjustments. However, diagnosing lactose intolerance is not straightforward, especially in primary care. AIM: To summarize available evidence on the diagnostic performance of gastrointestinal symptoms and self-reported milk (lactose) intolerance in primary care, and the relationship between lactose malabsorption and intolerance. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE and reference screening. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if the design was a primary diagnostic study; the patients were adults consulting because of non-acute abdominal symptoms; the diagnostic test included gastrointestinal symptoms and/or self-reported milk intolerance. A total of 26 primary diagnostic studies were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. They adhered to the most recent guidelines for conducting a diagnostic review as described in the Cochrane Diagnostic Reviewers' Handbook. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence and self-reported milk intolerance was highly variable. A non-Caucasian ethnic origin was associated with the presence of lactose malabsorption. Both lactose malabsorbers and lactose absorbers reported symptoms during the lactose hydrogen breath test. CONCLUSION: Our review shows that high-quality studies on the diagnosis of lactose malabsorption and intolerance in primary care are urgently needed. An important prerequisite would be to clearly define the concept of lactose intolerance, as well as how it should be assessed.
Authors: Adam D Farmer; Anne Grave Pedersen; Birgitte Brock; Poul Erik Jakobsen; Jesper Karmisholt; Sahar D Mohammed; S Mark Scott; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Christina Brock Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Benjamin Misselwitz; Daniel Pohl; Heiko Frühauf; Michael Fried; Stephan R Vavricka; Mark Fox Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Claire L Jansson-Knodell; Edward J Krajicek; Monica Ramakrishnan; Nicholas A Rogers; Robert Siwiec; Matt Bohm; Thomas Nowak; John Wo; Carolyn Lockett; Huiping Xu; Dennis A Savaiano; Andrea Shin Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 3.199