BACKGROUND: In recent decades, labour market participation has fallen in men, with large amounts of this decline accounted for by increases in permanent sickness. There is speculation that the rising numbers of permanently sick incorporate more people with less severe conditions than was previously the case. This paper examines the relationship between labour market position and subsequent mortality around State Pension Age. METHODS: Using linked census and death records in the ONS Longitudinal Study, samples of men aged 55-69 and women aged 50-64 were selected from each decennial census, 1971-2001 and their health followed up. Differences between the employed, unemployed and economically inactive in age-specific death rates, Standardised Mortality Ratios and odds of reporting limiting long-term illness were examined. RESULTS: Labour market activity in late middle age has changed since 1971. For example, the proportion of men employed at ages 60-64 years has fallen by 39%, and the proportion permanently sick has more than doubled. Despite this change, there has been stability in the RR of mortality between labour market positions. Working people have the lowest risk of premature death, while, relative to working people, the permanently sick continue to have mortalities around three times higher among men and four to five times higher among women. CONCLUSION: The evidence does not support the notion that the permanently sick are becoming less seriously ill. The persistence of the group's raised mortality suggests that measures aimed at encouraging later life employment should ensure provision of work environments suitable for people with chronic illnesses.
BACKGROUND: In recent decades, labour market participation has fallen in men, with large amounts of this decline accounted for by increases in permanent sickness. There is speculation that the rising numbers of permanently sick incorporate more people with less severe conditions than was previously the case. This paper examines the relationship between labour market position and subsequent mortality around State Pension Age. METHODS: Using linked census and death records in the ONS Longitudinal Study, samples of men aged 55-69 and women aged 50-64 were selected from each decennial census, 1971-2001 and their health followed up. Differences between the employed, unemployed and economically inactive in age-specific death rates, Standardised Mortality Ratios and odds of reporting limiting long-term illness were examined. RESULTS: Labour market activity in late middle age has changed since 1971. For example, the proportion of men employed at ages 60-64 years has fallen by 39%, and the proportion permanently sick has more than doubled. Despite this change, there has been stability in the RR of mortality between labour market positions. Working people have the lowest risk of premature death, while, relative to working people, the permanently sick continue to have mortalities around three times higher among men and four to five times higher among women. CONCLUSION: The evidence does not support the notion that the permanently sick are becoming less seriously ill. The persistence of the group's raised mortality suggests that measures aimed at encouraging later life employment should ensure provision of work environments suitable for people with chronic illnesses.
Authors: Judith Brown; Evangelia Demou; Madeleine Ann Tristram; Harper Gilmour; Kaveh A Sanati; Ewan B Macdonald Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Terje A Eikemo; Rasmus Hoffmann; Margarete C Kulik; Ivana Kulhánová; Marlen Toch-Marquardt; Gwenn Menvielle; Caspar Looman; Domantas Jasilionis; Pekka Martikainen; Olle Lundberg; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew McAuley; Cheryl Denny; Martin Taulbut; Rory Mitchell; Colin Fischbacher; Barbara Graham; Ian Grant; Paul O'Hagan; David McAllister; Gerry McCartney Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ranu Sewdas; Astrid de Wind; Sari Stenholm; Pieter Coenen; Ilse Louwerse; Cécile Boot; Allard van der Beek Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Judith Brown; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Alastair H Leyland; Ronald W McQuaid; John Frank; Ewan B Macdonald Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-10-27 Impact factor: 2.692