Literature DB >> 20522308

Four-part proximal humeral fractures: diagnosis with the 'sunset' sign on anteroposterior radiograph.

C Kachramanoglou1, R Chidambaram, D Mok.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Four-part proximal humeral fractures require surgical intervention. However, they can be difficult to diagnose in radiological images. We aim to define a new, easily recognisable, radiological sign as a predictor of four-part fracture of the proximal humerus in a plain anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our 'sunset' sign as 'articular surface of humeral head pointing away from the glenoid and tilted upwards, in the presence of a displaced greater tuberosity fracture'. We postulate that a patient with proximal humerus fracture showing this sign has four-part fracture until proven otherwise. Between 2002 and 2006, 80 consecutive patients had surgical treatment of their proximal humeral fractures in our unit. Pre-operative radiographs and operative notes of 79 patients were evaluated independently by three blinded observers. The presence of 'sunset' sign was recorded. Findings were then correlated with the operative diagnoses to confirm whether they were four-part fractures or not. With 95% confidence interval, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for our diagnostic sign.
RESULTS: Of 79 patients, 30 displayed 'sunset' sign in their pre-operative radiograph. Of these, 28 had confirmed four-part fractures operatively. The positive predictive value of 'sunset' sign was 93%. The specificity and sensitivity were 95% and 78%, respectively. The sensitivity was affected by eight patients with four-part fractures with displaced articular head fragment which had dropped either medially or posteriorly.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, in patients with proximal humeral fractures, the presence of 'sunset' sign in the anteroposterior radiograph is a reliable indicator of four-part fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522308      PMCID: PMC3229353          DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12699663903638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer-classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists.

Authors:  S Brorson; J Bagger; A Sylvest; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  G O Sjödén; T Movin; P Aspelin; P Güntner; A Shalabi
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-08

7.  Understanding proximal humerus fractures: image analysis, classification, and treatment.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling; Charles M Rowland; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Reliability and reproducibility of radiographic interpretation of proximal humeral fracture pathoanatomy.

Authors:  P I Sallay; R A Pedowitz; W J Mallon; R M Vandemark; J D Dalton; K P Speer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Diagnosing displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a review of observer studies.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Jens Bagger; Annette Sylvest; Asbjørn Hrobjartsson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value.

Authors:  G O Sjödén; T Movin; P Güntner; P Aspelin; L Ahrengart; H Ersmark; A Sperber
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Early-stage radiological critical analysis of unsuccessful cases following a four-part fracture osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus: focus on the "P" sign.

Authors:  Georgios Touloupakis; Wilfried Stuflesser; Fabrizio Ferrara; Alessio Maione; Guido Antonini; Cornelio Crippa
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-08-23

2.  Humeral Tip-apex-distance as a Prognostic Marker for Proximal Humeral Fractures in 203 Patients.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Tobias Himmelmann; Klaus Dresing
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-04-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.