Literature DB >> 20522072

Hysterectomy trends in Australia--between 2000/01 and 2004/05.

Erin L Hill1, Melissa L Graham, Julia M Shelley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy is a major and common surgical procedure that has the potential to provide relief from ongoing gynaecological problems, but is often associated with negative impacts on health and wellbeing. Research indicates that hysterectomy rates and trends vary widely between and within countries; yet little is known about patterns in Australia. AIMS: This research aimed to describe hysterectomy rates and trends in Australia between 2000/01 and 2004/05.
METHODS: This repeat cross-sectional study used routinely collected data from all hospitals in Australia. Data on all women admitted to hospital for a hysterectomy were obtained from the National Hospital Morbidity Database (2000/01-2004/05). Data were analysed by calculating population rates for each type of hysterectomy. Incidence rate ratios were calculated to assess changes over time.
RESULTS: Hysterectomy rates in Australia declined from 34.8 per 10 000 women in 2000/01 to 31.2 per 10 000 women in 2004/05. A decline in the incidence rate for abdominal hysterectomy (from 18.7 to 15.1 per 10 000 women) and the incidence rate for concurrent oophorectomy (from 12.4 to 11.3 per 10 000 women) were also observed during this time period. At each point in time, the highest incidence rates for hysterectomy were for women aged 45-54 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy rates in Australia are declining over time and currently appear to be lower than most other countries. More hysterectomies are performed vaginally than in Canada, the USA, the UK and Finland and the rate of concurrent oophorectomy is less than that reported in the USA and the UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20522072     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  10 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective.

Authors:  Jinjuan Yang; Xiaojing Fan; Jianmin Gao; Dan Li; Yongjian Xu; Gang Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Crying baby gets the milk? The governmentality of grievance redressal for patient rights violations in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Meena Putturaj; Anja Krumeich; Prashanth Nuggehalli Srinivas; Nora Engel; Bart Criel; Sara Van Belle
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-05

3.  Changing trends in reproductive/lifestyle factors in UK women: descriptive study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Clara Glazer; Matthew Burnell; Andy Ryan; Hannah Berry; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Robert Woolas; Steve J Skates; Stuart Campbell; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patterns of hysterectomy in India: a national and state-level analysis of the Fourth National Family Health Survey (2015-2016).

Authors:  S Desai; A Shukla; D Nambiar; R Ved
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Geographic variation of hysterectomy rates in the Israeli health care system during the years 2007-2016.

Authors:  Roy Lauterbach; Mendlovic Joseph; Ziona Haklai; Lavie Gil; Lior Lowenstein
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-07-16

6.  Sexual function after total laparoscopic hysterectomy or transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disorders: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Xiaoyan Ying
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 7.  Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Camille Sallée; François Margueritte; Pierre Marquet; Pascal Piver; Yves Aubard; Vincent Lavoué; Ludivine Dion; Tristan Gauthier
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Ten years of progress--improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996-2006: a longitudinal observation study.

Authors:  Juha Mäkinen; Tea Brummer; Jyrki Jalkanen; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Jaana Fraser; Eija Tomás; Päivi Härkki; Jari Sjöberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Sapna Desai; Oona Mr Campbell; Tara Sinha; Ajay Mahal; Simon Cousens
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 10.  The effectiveness of surgical procedures to prevent post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Greta Lisa Carlin; Barbara Bodner-Adler; Heinrich Husslein; Magdalena Ritter; Wolfgang Umek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.