Literature DB >> 20521640

Passive protection afforded by maternally-derived antibodies in chickens and the antibodies' interference with the protection elicited by avian influenza-inactivated vaccines in progeny.

J De Vriese1, M Steensels, V Palya, Y Gardin, K Moore Dorsey, B Lambrecht, S Van Borm, T van den Berg.   

Abstract

Systematic vaccination can be applied when a disease has become enzootic in a country or region. The final goal of the approach is to control or eradicate the disease within the country. This is a long-term vaccination plan that could be applied nationwide to all commercial and backyard poultry. However, after several months of vaccination in enzootic areas, maternally derived antibody (MDA) is present in young chicks, providing some protection and/or interference with vaccination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of protection afforded by MDA against challenge with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), and its suspected interference with current inactivated vaccines in broilers under controlled laboratory conditions. In the first set of experiments, broilers were vaccinated with inactivated vaccines containing H5N2 subtype antigens in the presence or absence of homologue MDAs and challenged with a clade 2.2 H5N1 HPAIV. In the second set of experiments, day-old broilers, either with or without avian influenza MDA, received a regular-type monovalent H5N2 AI vaccine (0.5 ml) or a concentrated (0.2 ml) AL-Newcastle disease virus combined inactivated vaccine subcutaneously. They were then challenged at 11 or 35 days of age. In conclusion, our results indicate that protection induced by day-old administration of inactivated vaccine (regular or concentrated) in the presence or absence of MDA to H5N2 AIV induces poor protection against challenge with H5N1 HPAIV and should not be recommended. Based on our results, vaccination of MDA-positive chickens at a later age (10 days) seems to be a valuable recommendation, although MDAs may still interfere with vaccination to a lesser extent because they are present up to 3 wk posthatch. Therefore, in areas with high infection pressure, when possible, two vaccinations are recommended for optimal protection. Also, it might be advisable to take into account day-old AI MDA titers when one is determining the optimal age of vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20521640     DOI: 10.1637/8908-043009-Reg.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  11 in total

1.  A single vaccination of commercial broilers does not reduce transmission of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza.

Authors:  Okti Poetri; Annemarie Bouma; Ivo Claassen; Guus Koch; Retno Soejoedono; Arjan Stegeman; Michiel van Boven
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.683

2.  Effect of passive immunization on immunogenicity and protective efficacy of vaccination against a Mexican low-pathogenic avian H5N2 influenza virus.

Authors:  Heather L Forrest; Alejandro Garcia; Angela Danner; Jon P Seiler; Kimberly Friedman; Robert G Webster; Jeremy C Jones
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Immunogenicity and efficacy of fowlpox-vectored and inactivated avian influenza vaccines alone or in a prime-boost schedule in chickens with maternal antibodies.

Authors:  Alexandra Richard-Mazet; Sylvain Goutebroze; François-Xavier Le Gros; David E Swayne; Michel Bublot
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Protective Efficacy of Recombinant Turkey Herpes Virus (rHVT-H5) and Inactivated H5N1 Vaccines in Commercial Mulard Ducks against the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 Clade 2.2.1 Virus.

Authors:  Walid H Kilany; Marwa Safwat; Samy M Mohammed; Abdullah Salim; Folorunso Oludayo Fasina; Olubunmi G Fasanmi; Azhar G Shalaby; Gwenaelle Dauphin; Mohammed K Hassan; Juan Lubroth; Yilma M Jobre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Induction of non-specific suppression in chicks by specific combination of maternal antibody and related antigen.

Authors:  Mohamed Fahmy Abou Elazab; Hiroyuki Horiuchi; Shuichi Furusawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 6.  Universal Vaccines and Vaccine Platforms to Protect against Influenza Viruses in Humans and Agriculture.

Authors:  Daniela S Rajão; Daniel R Pérez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  IFNγ Production Profile in Turkeys of Different Immunological Status after TRT Vaccination.

Authors:  Marcin Śmiałek; Bartłomiej Tykałowski; Daria Dziewulska; Joanna Kowalczyk; Andrzej Koncicki
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.744

8.  The efficacy of binary ethylenimine-inactivated vaccines of Gianyar-1/AK/2014 virulent strain in protecting chickens against Tabanan-1/ARP/2017 virulent Newcastle disease virus isolates.

Authors:  Anak Agung Ayu Mirah Adi; I Nyoman Mantik Astawa; I Gusti Agung Arta Putra
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-06-08

Review 9.  Insight into alternative approaches for control of avian influenza in poultry, with emphasis on highly pathogenic H5N1.

Authors:  E M Abdelwhab; Hafez M Hafez
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Maternally-Derived Antibodies Protect against Challenge with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus of the H7N3 Subtype.

Authors:  Stivalis Cardenas-Garcia; Lucas Ferreri; Zhimin Wan; Silvia Carnaccini; Ginger Geiger; Adebimpe O Obadan; Charles L Hofacre; Daniela Rajao; Daniel R Perez
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.