INTRODUCTION: African American men have disproportionately high incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer when compared to other ethnic groups in the United States. The identification of molecular factors that contribute to this disparity could improve diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the miRNA 26a expression profile in novel African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines at each clinical stage of prostate cancer progression. METHODS: The miR-26a expression profile was investigated using novel African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines representing each pathological stage: non-malignant, malignant, and metastatic tumors. Relative miRNA expression was determined by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Our data showed a 2.25 fold increase for miR-26a in the non-malignant, a 13.3 fold increase in malignant and 2.38 fold increase in metastatic tumors, when comparing African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines of similar clinical stage and pathological grade. African American malignant prostate cancer cell lines showed the most significant fold difference in expression among all cell lines tested. Furthermore, there was a general increase in miR-26a expression toward the more aggressive cell lines in both African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines. CONCLUSION: To date, we are unaware of any studies that compare the miRNA profile at different stages of prostate cancer among two racial groups. Although a gene target for miR-26a has not been identified, our data show a possible role for miRNA regulation of gene expression in prostate cancer progression. Furthermore, this study suggests that miRNAs could possibly contribute to the aggressiveness associated in African American patients with prostate cancer.
INTRODUCTION: African American men have disproportionately high incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer when compared to other ethnic groups in the United States. The identification of molecular factors that contribute to this disparity could improve diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the miRNA 26a expression profile in novel African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines at each clinical stage of prostate cancer progression. METHODS: The miR-26a expression profile was investigated using novel African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines representing each pathological stage: non-malignant, malignant, and metastatic tumors. Relative miRNA expression was determined by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Our data showed a 2.25 fold increase for miR-26a in the non-malignant, a 13.3 fold increase in malignant and 2.38 fold increase in metastatic tumors, when comparing African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines of similar clinical stage and pathological grade. African American malignant prostate cancer cell lines showed the most significant fold difference in expression among all cell lines tested. Furthermore, there was a general increase in miR-26a expression toward the more aggressive cell lines in both African American and Caucasian prostate cell lines. CONCLUSION: To date, we are unaware of any studies that compare the miRNA profile at different stages of prostate cancer among two racial groups. Although a gene target for miR-26a has not been identified, our data show a possible role for miRNA regulation of gene expression in prostate cancer progression. Furthermore, this study suggests that miRNAs could possibly contribute to the aggressiveness associated in African American patients with prostate cancer.
Authors: Omer Barad; Eti Meiri; Amir Avniel; Ranit Aharonov; Adi Barzilai; Isaac Bentwich; Uri Einav; Shlomit Gilad; Patrick Hurban; Yael Karov; Edward K Lobenhofer; Eilon Sharon; Yoel M Shiboleth; Marat Shtutman; Zvi Bentwich; Paz Einat Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: R W deVere White; A D Deitch; A G Jackson; R Gandour-Edwards; J Marshalleck; S E Soares; S N Toscano; J M Lunetta; S L Stewart Journal: J Urol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Wen-Chin Huang; Zhihui Xie; Hiroyuki Konaka; Jaro Sodek; Haiyen E Zhau; Leland W K Chung Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brian Shuch; Maryann Mikhail; Jaya Satagopan; Peng Lee; Herman Yee; Caroline Chang; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Samir S Taneja; Iman Osman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stefan Ambs; Robyn L Prueitt; Ming Yi; Robert S Hudson; Tiffany M Howe; Fabio Petrocca; Tiffany A Wallace; Chang-Gong Liu; Stefano Volinia; George A Calin; Harris G Yfantis; Robert M Stephens; Carlo M Croce Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: N M Navone; M Olive; M Ozen; R Davis; P Troncoso; S M Tu; D Johnston; A Pollack; S Pathak; A C von Eschenbach; C J Logothetis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R Stephanie Huang; Eric R Gamazon; Dana Ziliak; Yujia Wen; Hae Kyung Im; Wei Zhang; Claudia Wing; Shiwei Duan; Wasim K Bleibel; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Liselle C Bovell; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Balananda-Dhurjati K Putcha; Venkat R Katkoori; Bin Zhang; Sejong Bae; Karan P Singh; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 12.531