Literature DB >> 20521375

Community-driven standards-based electronic laboratory data-sharing networks.

Patina Zarcone1, Dale Nordenberg, Michelle Meigs, Ulrike Merrick, Daniel Jernigan, Steven H Hinrichs.   

Abstract

Public health laboratories (PHLs) are critical components of the nation's healthcare system, serving as stewards of valuable specimens, delivering important diagnostic results to support clinical and public health programs, supporting public health policy, and conducting research. This article discusses the need for and challenges of creating standards-based data-sharing networks across the PHL community, which led to the development of the PHL Interoperability Project (PHLIP). Launched by the Association of Public Health Laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in September 2006, PHLIP has leveraged a unique community-based collaborative process, catalyzing national capabilities to more effectively share electronic laboratory-generated diagnostic information and bolster the nation's health security. PHLIP is emerging as a model of accelerated innovation for the fields of laboratory science, technology, and public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20521375      PMCID: PMC2846802          DOI: 10.1177/00333549101250S206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods.

Authors:  P Effler; M Ching-Lee; A Bogard; M C Ieong; T Nekomoto; D Jernigan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Electronic laboratory reporting: barriers, solutions and findings.

Authors:  J M Overhage; J Suico; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2001-11

3.  PHLIS: an electronic system for reporting public health data from remote sites.

Authors:  N H Bean; S M Martin; H Bradford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Public health, data standards, and vocabulary: crucial infrastructure for reliable public health surveillance.

Authors:  Christopher G Chute; Denise Koo
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2002-05

5.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Shaun Grannis; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Impact of electronic laboratory reporting on hepatitis A surveillance in New York City.

Authors:  Kristen M Moore; Vasudha Reddy; Deborah Kapell; Sharon Balter
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

7.  Multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection associated with consumption of packaged spinach, August-September 2006: the Wisconsin investigation.

Authors:  Arthur M Wendel; Diep Hoang Johnson; Umid Sharapov; Juliana Grant; John R Archer; Timothy Monson; Cindy Koschmann; Jeffrey P Davis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The evolving Public Health Laboratory System.

Authors:  Frances Pouch Downes; John C Ridderhof
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The Affordable Care Act, meaningful use, and their impact on public health laboratories.

Authors:  Steven H Hinrichs; Patina Zarcone
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Government leadership in addressing public health priorities: strides and delays in electronic laboratory reporting in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca Tave Gluskin; Maushumi Mavinkurve; Jay K Varma
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.