| Literature DB >> 20520837 |
Mary A Fletcher1, Xiao R Zeng, Kevin Maher, Silvina Levis, Barry Hurwitz, Michael Antoni, Gordon Broderick, Nancy G Klimas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) studies from our laboratory and others described decreased natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) and elevated proportion of lymphocytes expressing the activation marker, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) also known as CD26. However, neither these assays nor other laboratory tests are widely accepted for the diagnosis or prognosis of CFS. This study sought to determine if NKCC or DPPIV/CD26 have diagnostic accuracy for CFS. METHODS/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20520837 PMCID: PMC2876037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Natural killer cell cytotoxicity and dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 in chronic fatigue syndrome casesa compared to controlsb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NKCC% | 176 | 12 (8–21) | 230 | 28 (20–37) | .000 |
| % CD26+CD2+ Cells | 75 | 61 (55–66) | 100 | 52 (47–59) | .000 |
| sCD26 in Serum (ng/ml) | 73 | 489 (396–643) | 122 | 671 (496–871) | .000 |
| rMol CD26/CD2+ Cell | 77 | 3625 (2844–4633) | 102 | 4388 (3600–5388) | .001 |
Figure 1ROC analyses were used to evaluate NKCC as a predictor of CFS.
The nonparametric ROC plot (blue curve) indicated the ability of NKCC to discriminate between CFS cases and healthy controls. Smaller values for NKCC were associated with CFS cases. The 45 degree line (green) indicates the theoretical plot of a test with no discrimination between CFS and controls.
ROC curve analysis: Area Under the Curve (AUC) for natural killer cell cytotoxicity and dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 in chronic fatigue syndrome cases compared to controls.
| Variables | Area | Std. Error | Asymptotic Sig. | Asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval | |
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
| NKCC% | .776 | .024 | .000 | .729 | .823 |
| CD2+CD26+% | .746 | .037 | .000 | .674 | .818 |
| sCD26 ng/ml | .732 | .036 | .000 | .652 | .794 |
| rMolCD26/CD2+ cell | .650 | .042 | .001 | .568 | .733 |
Figure 2ROC analyses were used to evaluate %CD26+CD2+ lymphocytes as a predictor of CFS.
The nonparametric ROC plot (purple curve) indicated the ability of %CD26+CD2+ lymphocytes to discriminate between CFS cases and healthy controls. Larger values for %CD26+CD2+ lymphocytes were associated with CFS cases. The 45 degree line (green) indicates the theoretical plot of a test with no discrimination between CFS and controls.
Figure 3ROC analyses were used to evaluate serum dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 as a predictor of CFS.
The nonparametric ROC plot (red curve) indicated the ability of serum dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 to discriminate between CFS cases and healthy controls. Smaller values were associated with CFS cases. The 45 degree line (green) indicates the theoretical plot of a test with no discrimination between CFS and controls.
Figure 4ROC analyses were used to evaluate relative number of molecules of dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 on the surface of CD2+ lymphocytes as a predictor of CFS.
The nonparametric ROC plot (orange curve) indicated the ability of number of molecules of dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 on the surface of CD2+ lymphocytes to discriminate between CFS cases and healthy controls. Smaller values were associated with CFS cases. The 45 degree line (green) indicates the theoretical plot of a test with no discrimination between CFS and controls. cell at saturating concentrations of antibody; rMol/cell) is shown.