Literature DB >> 20520715

The role of mentorship in protégé performance.

R Dean Malmgren1, Julio M Ottino, Luís A Nunes Amaral.   

Abstract

The role of mentorship in protégé performance is a matter of importance to academic, business and governmental organizations. Although the benefits of mentorship for protégés, mentors and their organizations are apparent, the extent to which protégés mimic their mentors' career choices and acquire their mentorship skills is unclear. The importance of a science, technology, engineering and mathematics workforce to economic growth and the role of effective mentorship in maintaining a 'healthy' such workforce demand the study of the role of mentorship in academia. Here we investigate one aspect of mentor emulation by studying mentorship fecundity-the number of protégés a mentor trains-using data from the Mathematics Genealogy Project, which tracks the mentorship record of thousands of mathematicians over several centuries. We demonstrate that fecundity among academic mathematicians is correlated with other measures of academic success. We also find that the average fecundity of mentors remains stable over 60 years of recorded mentorship. We further discover three significant correlations in mentorship fecundity. First, mentors with low mentorship fecundities train protégés that go on to have mentorship fecundities 37% higher than expected. Second, in the first third of their careers, mentors with high fecundities train protégés that go on to have fecundities 29% higher than expected. Finally, in the last third of their careers, mentors with high fecundities train protégés that go on to have fecundities 31% lower than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20520715      PMCID: PMC6697046          DOI: 10.1038/nature09040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  3 in total

1.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Scientific publishing. Are you ready to become a number?

Authors:  Martin Enserink
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  I am not a scientist, I am a number.

Authors:  Philip E Bourne; J Lynn Fink
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total
  25 in total

1.  Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers.

Authors:  Alexander Michael Petersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment.

Authors:  Samuel F Way; Allison C Morgan; Daniel B Larremore; Aaron Clauset
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reputation and impact in academic careers.

Authors:  Alexander Michael Petersen; Santo Fortunato; Raj K Pan; Kimmo Kaski; Orion Penner; Armando Rungi; Massimo Riccaboni; H Eugene Stanley; Fabio Pammolli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory.

Authors:  Samuel F Way; Allison C Morgan; Aaron Clauset; Daniel B Larremore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  EIGENVECTOR-BASED CENTRALITY MEASURES FOR TEMPORAL NETWORKS.

Authors:  Dane Taylor; Sean A Myers; Aaron Clauset; Mason A Porter; Peter J Mucha
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Intellectual synthesis in mentorship determines success in academic careers.

Authors:  Jean F Liénard; Titipat Achakulvisut; Daniel E Acuna; Stephen V David
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Is coaching experience associated with effective use of timeouts in basketball?

Authors:  Serguei Saavedra; Satyam Mukherjee; James P Bagrow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes.

Authors:  Amin Mazloumian; Young-Ho Eom; Dirk Helbing; Sergi Lozano; Santo Fortunato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.

Authors:  Frank W Pfrieger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neurotree: a collaborative, graphical database of the academic genealogy of neuroscience.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.