Literature DB >> 20519906

Endotoxin removal: how far from the evidence? The EUPHAS 2 Project.

Erica L Martin, Dinna N Cruz, Gianpaola Monti, Gianpaolo Casella, Sergio Vesconi, V Marco Ranieri, Claudio Ronco, Massimo Antonelli.   

Abstract

Since 1994, a polystyrene fiber cartridge used for extracorporeal hemoperfusion, to which polymyxin B is bound and immobilized, has been used in septic patients in order to absorb and remove circulating lipopolysaccharide, thereby neutralizing the effects of this endotoxin. This therapy gradually gained acceptance as the amount of evidence increased from initial small clinical studies to a carefully conducted systematic review, and ultimately to the multicentered randomized clinical trial conducted in Italy, entitled the EUPHAS Study (Early Use of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Abdominal Septic Shock). While the conclusions of this initial randomized controlled trial were in agreement with previous studies, it possessed some important limitations, including a slow accrual rate, enrolling only 64 patients between 2004 and 2007, inability to blind treating physicians, and a premature study termination based on the results of the scheduled interim analysis. These limitations resulted in a modest patient sample size, which may have overestimated the true magnitude of the clinical effect. Apart from Japan, Italy is the current primary user of polymyxin B-hemoperfusion in the treatment of sepsis, with about 600 cartridges being used per year. However, no structured collection of data has been attempted, resulting in the an opportunity to understand the effects of polymyxin B-hemoperfusion on a large, diverse sample size. In response, Italian investigators and users of this treatment have designed a new prospective multicentered, collaborative data collection study, entitled EUPHAS 2. The aim of the EUPHAS 2 project is to collect a large database regarding polymyxin B-hemoperfusion treatments in order to better evaluate the efficacy and biological significance of endotoxin removal in clinical practice. Additionally, this study aims to verify the reproducibility of the data currently available in the literature, evaluate the patient population chosen for treatment and identify subpopulations of patients who may benefit from this treatment more than others. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519906     DOI: 10.1159/000315926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrib Nephrol        ISSN: 0302-5144            Impact factor:   1.580


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Adsorption therapy in sepsis].

Authors:  D Hasper; J C Schefold; A Jörres
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  Antimicrobial peptides and their potential application in inflammation and sepsis.

Authors:  Tobias Schuerholz; Klaus Brandenburg; Gernot Marx
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Renal replacement therapy neutralizes elevated MIF levels in septic shock.

Authors:  Julia Pohl; Maria Papathanasiou; Martin Heisler; Pia Stock; Malte Kelm; Ulrike B Hendgen-Cotta; Tienush Rassaf; Peter Luedike
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2016-06-16

4.  Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry.

Authors:  Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; Antonio Artigas; Roberto Fumagalli; Gianpaola Monti; Vito Marco Ranieri; Claudio Ronco; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.925

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.