Literature DB >> 20519275

The cost of a QALY.

R Kirkdale1, J Krell, C O'Hanlon Brown, M Tuthill, J Waxman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current regulation of drug approvals has caused considerable controversy as entrusted to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, and has led to a lack of availability of modern medicines on the basis of calculations made of 'value'. AIM: We have examined the assessment tool used by National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) to establish the cost of drugs in order to assess whether it is a reasonable and objective evaluation methodology.
DESIGN: A review of the methods of analysis.
METHODS: An objective assessment of the value of the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY).
RESULTS: We conclude that current methods used by NICE to assess drug costs are arbitrary, subjective and fail to reflect the true costs for patients, which are grossly overestimated.
CONCLUSION: NICE needs to look again at the evaluation methods for calculating drug costs, and change their methodology from a subjective to an objective measure of true cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519275     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  8 in total

1.  Should be NICE have a Spanish NICE?

Authors:  J Feliu; E Espinosa
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Cost-effectiveness of the PECARN rules in children with minor head trauma.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Zhuo Yang; Michael Urbich; James F Holmes; Marike Zwienenberg-Lee; Joy Melnikow; Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Measuring the Value of Pharmaceuticals in the US Health System.

Authors:  Surrey M Walton; Anirban Basu; John Mullahy; Samuel Hong; Glen T Schumock
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing a clinical decision rule versus usual care to risk stratify children for intraabdominal injury after blunt torso trauma.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Zhuo Yang; John A Clark; Nathan Kuppermann; James F Holmes; Joy Melnikow
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Efficacy of modified bevacizumab-XELOX therapy in Japanese patients with stage IV recurrent or non-resectable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daiki Yokoyama; Masaya Mukai; Shuji Uda; Kyouko Kishima; Takuya Koike; Sayuri Hasegawa; Hideki Izumi; Souichirou Yamamoto; Takayuki Tajima; Eiji Nomura; Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

6.  The economic pressures for biosimilar drug use in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Paul Cornes
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16

8.  Queue questions: Ethics of COVID-19 vaccine prioritization.

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Julian Savulescu; Dominic Wilkinson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.512

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.