Literature DB >> 20519217

Lazy group members are substitute helpers in carrion crows.

Vittorio Baglione1, Daniela Canestrari, Elisa Chiarati, Ruben Vera, Jose M Marcos.   

Abstract

In many cooperatively breeding societies, helping effort varies greatly among group members, raising the question of why dominant individuals tolerate lazy subordinates. In groups of carrion crows Corvus corone corone, helpers at the nest increase breeders' reproductive success, but chick provisioning is unevenly distributed among non-breeders, with a gradient that ranges from individuals that work as much as the breeders to others that completely refrain from visiting the nest. Here we show that lazy non-breeders represent an insurance workforce that fully compensates for a reduction in the provisioning effort of another group member, avoiding a decrease in reproductive success. When we temporarily impaired a carer, decreasing its nest attendance, the laziest non-breeders increased their provisioning rate and individuals that initially refrained from visiting the nest started helping. Breeders, in contrast, did not increase chick provisioning. This shows that lazy non-breeders can buffer a sudden unfavourable circumstance and suggests that group stability relies on the potential contribution of group members in addition to their current effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20519217      PMCID: PMC2981929          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Helping effort and future fitness in cooperation animal societies.

Authors:  M A Cant; J Field
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Kin selection in cooperative alliances of carrion crows.

Authors:  Vittorio Baglione; Daniela Canestrari; José M Marcos; Jan Ekman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Magdalena Nystrand; Jan Ekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced?

Authors:  Francis L W Ratnieks; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Constraints on evolutionary shifts in cooperative breeding.

Authors:  Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Cooperation-The role of past and present.

Authors:  Jan Ekman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  A DNA test to sex most birds.

Authors:  R Griffiths; M C Double; K Orr; R J Dawson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation.

Authors:  H Kokko; R A Johnstone; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Some examples of regression towards the mean.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

10.  Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates.

Authors:  Ashleigh S Griffin; Stuart A West
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cheating and punishment in cooperative animal societies.

Authors:  Christina Riehl; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Group-size-dependent punishment of idle subordinates in a cooperative breeder where helpers pay to stay.

Authors:  Stefan Fischer; Markus Zöttl; Frank Groenewoud; Barbara Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Group size increases inequality in cooperative behaviour.

Authors:  Shay Rotics; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Response of a specialist bat to the loss of a critical resource.

Authors:  Gloriana Chaverri; Thomas H Kunz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.