Literature DB >> 20518807

A one-year study to assess the safety and efficacy of the CB1R inverse agonist taranabant in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

M S Kipnes1, P Hollander, K Fujioka, I Gantz, T Seck, N Erondu, Y Shentu, K Lu, S Suryawanshi, M Chou, A O Johnson-Levonas, S B Heymsfield, D Shapiro, K D Kaufman, J M Amatruda.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of taranabant in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in overweight and obese patients with T2DM (ages > or = 18 and < or = 75 years) with a BMI > or = 27 kg/m(2) and < or = 43 kg/m(2) and HbA1c > or =7.0 and < or = 10.0%, who were either not on an antihyperglycaemic agent or on a stable dose of metformin (> or = 1500 mg/day). After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to placebo (N = 156) or taranabant 0.5-mg (N = 155), 1-mg (N = 157), or 2-mg (N = 155) once daily for 52 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline in body weight (BW) and HbA1c at Week 36, with results at Week 52 being key secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: In the all-patients-treated population, using a last-observation-carried-forward analysis, reductions in BW were -2.5, -3.7, -4.5 and -5.1 kg at Week 36 and -2.4, -4.0, -4.6 and -5.3 kg at Week 52 in the placebo, 0.5-, 1- and 2-mg groups, respectively (all doses significant vs. placebo at both time points). The proportion of patients who lost > or = 5 and > or = 10% of their baseline BW was significantly greater in the 1- and 2-mg groups vs. placebo at Week 36 and all taranabant groups vs. placebo at Week 52. Reductions in HbA1c were -0.40, -0.47, -0.68 and -0.71% at Week 36 and -0.30, -0.43, -0.65 and -0.64% at Week 52, in the placebo, 0.5-, 1- and 2-mg groups, respectively (1- and 2-mg doses significant vs. placebo at both time points). After 52 weeks, the incidences of adverse experiences classified in the gastrointestinal (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting), nervous system-related (dizziness, sensory-related), and psychiatric (irritability, depression-related) organ systems were numerically higher or statistically significantly higher in all taranabant groups compared with the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: After 36 and 52 weeks, treatment with taranabant at the 1- and 2-mg doses led to clinically significant weight loss and improvement in glycaemic parameters in overweight and obese patients with T2DM that was associated with dose-related increases in adverse experiences. Based on these data and data from other Phase III clinical studies, it was determined that the overall safety and efficacy profile of taranabant did not support further development for the treatment of obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20518807     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01188.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  18 in total

1.  Impact of circadian rhythmicity and sleep restriction on circulating endocannabinoid (eCB) N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide).

Authors:  Erin C Hanlon
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 2.  Limitations in anti-obesity drug development: the critical role of hunger-promoting neurons.

Authors:  Marcelo O Dietrich; Tamas L Horvath
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  The Endocannabinoid System and Heart Disease: The Role of Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2.

Authors:  Makenzie L Fulmer; Douglas P Thewke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2018

4.  Surinabant, a selective cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonist, inhibits Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced central nervous system and heart rate effects in humans.

Authors:  Linda E Klumpers; Christine Roy; Geraldine Ferron; Sandrine Turpault; Franck Poitiers; Jean-Louis Pinquier; Johan G C van Hasselt; Lineke Zuurman; Frank A S Erwich; Joop M A van Gerven
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  The role of cannabinoids in regulation of nausea and vomiting, and visceral pain.

Authors:  Zubair Malik; Daniel Baik; Ron Schey
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

6.  Interaction between the endocannabinoid and serotonergic system in the exhibition of head twitch response in four mouse strains.

Authors:  Chiara Ceci; Martina Proietti Onori; Simone Macrì; Giovanni Laviola
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 7.  The Role of the Endocannabinoid System in the Brain-Gut Axis.

Authors:  Keith A Sharkey; John W Wiley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Therapeutic potential and safety considerations for the clinical use of synthetic cannabinoids.

Authors:  Dennis J Sholler; Marilyn A Huestis; Benjamin Amendolara; Ryan Vandrey; Ziva D Cooper
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  Druggable Targets in Endocannabinoid Signaling.

Authors:  Ann M Gregus; Matthew W Buczynski
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Regulation of nausea and vomiting by cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system.

Authors:  Keith A Sharkey; Nissar A Darmani; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.