Literature DB >> 20518453

The role of local public health laboratories.

Michael L Wilson1, Stephen Gradus, Scott J Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Local public health laboratories (PHLs) serve many of the same roles as state PHLs and often perform many or portions of the 11 Core Functions and Capabilities of State Public Health Laboratories; however, they differ in several important ways. First, many local laboratories provide testing at the site of patient care (e.g., sexually transmitted infection clinics) or address local environmental issues (e.g., water quality). Second, local PHLs support the missions of local public health departments, which may differ from those at the state level. Third, local PHLs often serve as conduits, collecting specimens for various state-level screening and disease-control programs; and while they may not perform the testing, local PHLs are responsible for tracking specimens, ordering tests, and reporting results. Fourth, local PHLs often serve as surge capacity for state PHLs, particularly for testing to support emergency response. Last, local PHLs work with and are typically co-located in the local public health agency with other public health programs. Local PHL professionals work as a team with investigators, inspectors, and community and public health medical professionals and, thus, are poised to provide rapid and relevant responses to community needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20518453      PMCID: PMC2846811          DOI: 10.1177/00333549101250S215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  6 in total

1.  The evolving Public Health Laboratory System.

Authors:  Frances Pouch Downes; John C Ridderhof
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The laboratory efficiencies initiative: partnership for building a sustainable national public health laboratory system.

Authors:  John C Ridderhof; Anthony D Moulton; Renée M Ned; Janet K A Nicholson; May C Chu; Scott J Becker; Eric C Blank; Karen J Breckenridge; Victor Waddell; Charles Brokopp
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Milwaukee Laboratory System Improvement Program (L-SIP).

Authors:  M Stephen Gradus; Sanjib Bhattacharyya; Amy Murphy; Julie N Becker; Bevan K Baker
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The Use of a Shared Services Model for Mycobacteriology Testing: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Cortney Stafford; Robyn Atkinson-Dunn; Sarah N Buss; Tracy Dalton; Debbie Gibson; Stephanie Johnston; Ewa King; Shou-Yean Grace Lin; Kara K Mitchell; William A Murtaugh; Heather Sease; Timothy R Southern; Julie L Tans-Kersten; Emily A Travanty; Laura R Triplett; Kelly Wroblewski; Angela M Starks
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Determinants for autopsy after unexplained deaths possibly resulting from infectious causes, United States.

Authors:  Lindy Liu; Laura L Sinden; Robert C Holman; Dianna M Blau
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 6.  Clinical Laboratory Biosafety Gaps: Lessons Learned from Past Outbreaks Reveal a Path to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Nancy E Cornish; Nancy L Anderson; Diego G Arambula; Matthew J Arduino; Andrew Bryan; Nancy C Burton; Bin Chen; Beverly A Dickson; Judith G Giri; Natasha K Griffith; Michael A Pentella; Reynolds M Salerno; Paramjit Sandhu; James W Snyder; Christopher A Tormey; Elizabeth A Wagar; Elizabeth G Weirich; Sheldon Campbell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 50.129

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.