OBJECTIVE: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate deliberate intentions and associated changes in brain activity into action, thereby offering patients with severe paralysis an alternative means of communication with and control over their environment. Such systems are not available yet, partly due to the high performance standard that is required. A major challenge in the development of implantable BCIs is to identify cortical regions and related functions that an individual can reliably and consciously manipulate. Research predominantly focuses on the sensorimotor cortex, which can be activated by imagining motor actions. However, because this region may not provide an optimal solution to all patients, other neuronal networks need to be examined. Therefore, we investigated whether the cognitive control network can be used for BCI purposes. We also determined the feasibility of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for noninvasive localization of the cognitive control network. METHODS: Three patients with intractable epilepsy, who were temporarily implanted with subdural grid electrodes for diagnostic purposes, attempted to gain BCI control using the electrocorticographic (ECoG) signal of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). RESULTS: All subjects quickly gained accurate BCI control by modulation of gamma-power of the left DLPFC. Prelocalization of the relevant region was performed with fMRI and was confirmed using the ECoG signals obtained during mental calculation localizer tasks. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that the cognitive control network is a suitable source of signals for BCI applications. They also demonstrate the feasibility of translating understanding about cognitive networks derived from functional neuroimaging into clinical applications.
OBJECTIVE: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate deliberate intentions and associated changes in brain activity into action, thereby offering patients with severe paralysis an alternative means of communication with and control over their environment. Such systems are not available yet, partly due to the high performance standard that is required. A major challenge in the development of implantable BCIs is to identify cortical regions and related functions that an individual can reliably and consciously manipulate. Research predominantly focuses on the sensorimotor cortex, which can be activated by imagining motor actions. However, because this region may not provide an optimal solution to all patients, other neuronal networks need to be examined. Therefore, we investigated whether the cognitive control network can be used for BCI purposes. We also determined the feasibility of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for noninvasive localization of the cognitive control network. METHODS: Three patients with intractable epilepsy, who were temporarily implanted with subdural grid electrodes for diagnostic purposes, attempted to gain BCI control using the electrocorticographic (ECoG) signal of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). RESULTS: All subjects quickly gained accurate BCI control by modulation of gamma-power of the left DLPFC. Prelocalization of the relevant region was performed with fMRI and was confirmed using the ECoG signals obtained during mental calculation localizer tasks. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that the cognitive control network is a suitable source of signals for BCI applications. They also demonstrate the feasibility of translating understanding about cognitive networks derived from functional neuroimaging into clinical applications.
Authors: Lise A Johnson; Tim Blakely; Dora Hermes; Shahin Hakimian; Nick F Ramsey; Jeffrey G Ojemann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anthony Ritaccio; Dana Boatman-Reich; Peter Brunner; Mackenzie C Cervenka; Andrew J Cole; Nathan Crone; Robert Duckrow; Anna Korzeniewska; Brian Litt; Kai J Miller; Daniel W Moran; Josef Parvizi; Jonathan Viventi; Justin Williams; Gerwin Schalk Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Minrui Yu; Yu Huang; Jason Ballweg; Hyuncheol Shin; Minghuang Huang; Donald E Savage; Max G Lagally; Erik W Dent; Robert H Blick; Justin C Williams Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-03-09 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Anthony Ritaccio; Michael Beauchamp; Conrado Bosman; Peter Brunner; Edward Chang; Nathan Crone; Aysegul Gunduz; Disha Gupta; Robert Knight; Eric Leuthardt; Brian Litt; Daniel Moran; Jeffrey Ojemann; Josef Parvizi; Nick Ramsey; Jochem Rieger; Jonathan Viventi; Bradley Voytek; Justin Williams; Gerwin Schalk Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Max A van den Boom; Mariska J Vansteensel; Melissa I Koppeschaar; Matthijs A H Raemaekers; Nick F Ramsey Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2019-08-02