Literature DB >> 20516695

Differential hemodynamic response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke patients with cortical versus subcortical infarcts.

Salma H Khaleel1, Iman M Bayoumy, Lobna M El-Nabil, Ramez Reda Moustafa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cerebral vasomotor response to ipsilesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on transcranial Doppler (TCD) in patients with recent ischemic stroke without carotid occlusive disease, and to compare this response in patients with cortical and subcortical infarcts.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with first-ever anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (<3 days) and no extra- or intracranial arterial stenosis were prospectively recruited. Patients were divided into 2 groups: cortical infarct (CI, n = 15) and subcortical infarct (SI, n = 16). TCD cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility index were measured before and after 10-Hz suprathreshold rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
RESULTS: ANOVA showed a greater percentage increase in middle cerebral artery (MCA) CBFV in the SI group than in the CI group following rTMS (p = 0.01). The percentage change in CBFV was significantly correlated between both MCAs in SI patients but not in CI patients (r = 0.8, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.05, p = 0.9, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: 10-Hz rTMS induces significant bilateral hemodynamic changes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, which appear to be less prominent and less synchronous in patients with cortical infarcts. These findings may allow optimization of the use of TMS in acute stroke. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20516695     DOI: 10.1159/000302708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neurol        ISSN: 0014-3022            Impact factor:   1.710


  4 in total

1.  Evidence for a Window of Enhanced Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex Following Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Brenton Hordacre; Duncan Austin; Katlyn E Brown; Lynton Graetz; Isabel Pareés; Stefania De Trane; Ann-Maree Vallence; Simon Koblar; Timothy Kleinig; Michelle N McDonnell; Richard Greenwood; Michael C Ridding; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Facilitate Lower Limb Recovery Following Stroke: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Samuel Gowan; Brenton Hordacre
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induces Quantified Functional and Structural Changes in Subcortical Stroke: A Combined Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Xi Bai; Binghu Jiang; Zhiwei Guo; Qiwen Mu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Haemodynamic Responses and Motor Performance in Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wanalee Klomjai; Benchaporn Aneksan; Songkram Chotik-Anuchit; Pentida Jitkaew; Kasina Chaichanudomsuk; Pagamas Piriyaprasarth; Roongtiwa Vachalathiti; Yongchai Nilanon; Vimonwan Hiengkaew
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.959

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.