BACKGROUND: The rapid failure of initial therapy with combinations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) that exclude zidovudine has not been fully explained by standard virus population analyses of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance. We therefore investigated HIV-1 genotype and phenotype at the single genome level in samples from patients on a failing regimen of tenofovir (TNV), didanosine (ddI) and lamivudine (3TC). METHODS: Single genome sequencing was performed on 9 failure samples containing both K65R and M184V mutations by standard genotype, either as wild-type/mutant mixtures (6/9) or as mutant only (3/9). Recombinant clones with different combinations of observed mutations were generated and tested for NRTI susceptibility. RESULTS: Of the 204 single genome sequences analysed, 50% were K65R/M184V double mutants, 38% were M184V single mutants, 10% were M184I single mutants and only 1% (2 sequences) were K65R single mutants. Phenotypic testing of recombinant clones showed a significant increase in resistance for double mutants: mean fold resistance to abacavir, ddI and TNV was 6.5, 4.3 and 1.6 for K65R/M184V double mutants versus 2.5, 1.9 and 0.6 for M184V single mutants, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mutants with K65R and M184V linked on the same genome were the most common HIV-1 variants in samples analysed from patients failing TNV, ddI and 3TC with both mutations detected by standard genotype. The double mutant exhibited reduced susceptibility to all three NRTIs in the regimen. This resistant phenotype, resulting from just two linked point mutations, likely contributes to rapid failure of NRTI combinations that exclude zidovudine.
BACKGROUND: The rapid failure of initial therapy with combinations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) that exclude zidovudine has not been fully explained by standard virus population analyses of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance. We therefore investigated HIV-1 genotype and phenotype at the single genome level in samples from patients on a failing regimen of tenofovir (TNV), didanosine (ddI) and lamivudine (3TC). METHODS: Single genome sequencing was performed on 9 failure samples containing both K65R and M184V mutations by standard genotype, either as wild-type/mutant mixtures (6/9) or as mutant only (3/9). Recombinant clones with different combinations of observed mutations were generated and tested for NRTI susceptibility. RESULTS: Of the 204 single genome sequences analysed, 50% were K65R/M184V double mutants, 38% were M184V single mutants, 10% were M184I single mutants and only 1% (2 sequences) were K65R single mutants. Phenotypic testing of recombinant clones showed a significant increase in resistance for double mutants: mean fold resistance to abacavir, ddI and TNV was 6.5, 4.3 and 1.6 for K65R/M184V double mutants versus 2.5, 1.9 and 0.6 for M184V single mutants, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mutants with K65R and M184V linked on the same genome were the most common HIV-1 variants in samples analysed from patients failing TNV, ddI and 3TC with both mutations detected by standard genotype. The double mutant exhibited reduced susceptibility to all three NRTIs in the regimen. This resistant phenotype, resulting from just two linked point mutations, likely contributes to rapid failure of NRTI combinations that exclude zidovudine.
Authors: Jérôme Deval; Kirsten L White; Michael D Miller; Neil T Parkin; Jérôme Courcambeck; Philippe Halfon; Boulbaba Selmi; Joëlle Boretto; Bruno Canard Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Urvi M Parikh; Dianna L Koontz; Chung K Chu; Raymond F Schinazi; John W Mellors Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sarah Palmer; Mary Kearney; Frank Maldarelli; Elias K Halvas; Christian J Bixby; Holly Bazmi; Diane Rock; Judith Falloon; Richard T Davey; Robin L Dewar; Julia A Metcalf; Scott Hammer; John W Mellors; John M Coffin Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Robert T Schooley; Peter Ruane; Robert A Myers; Gildon Beall; Harry Lampiris; Daniel Berger; Shan-Shan Chen; Michael D Miller; Erica Isaacson; Andrew K Cheng Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-06-14 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: K Henry; R J Wallace; P C Bellman; D Norris; R L Fisher; L L Ross; Q Liao; M S Shaefer Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2001-01-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Roy M Gulick; Heather J Ribaudo; Cecilia M Shikuma; Stephanie Lustgarten; Kathleen E Squires; William A Meyer; Edward P Acosta; Bruce R Schackman; Christopher D Pilcher; Robert L Murphy; William E Maher; Mallory D Witt; Richard C Reichman; Sally Snyder; Karin L Klingman; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathleen Squires; Anton L Pozniak; Gerald Pierone; Corklin R Steinhart; Daniel Berger; Nicholaos C Bellos; Stephen L Becker; Michael Wulfsohn; Michael D Miller; John J Toole; Dion F Coakley; Andrew Cheng Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M H Nguyen; R F Schinazi; C Shi; N M Goudgaon; P M McKenna; J W Mellors Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jean L Mbisa; Ravi K Gupta; Desire Kabamba; Veronica Mulenga; Moxmalama Kalumbi; Chifumbe Chintu; Chris M Parry; Diana M Gibb; Sarah A Walker; Patricia A Cane; Deenan Pillay Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.602