BACKGROUND: International trials have shown that CD4+ T-cell-guided structured treatment interruptions (STI) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) lead to worse outcomes than continuous treatment. We simulated continuous ART and STI strategies with higher CD4+ T-cell interruption/reintroduction thresholds than those assessed in actual trials. METHODS: Using a model of HIV, we simulated cohorts of African adults with different baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (< or = 200; 201-350; and 351-500 cells/microl). We varied ART initiation criteria (immediate; CD4+ T-cell count < 350 cells/microl or > or = 350 cells/microl with severe HIV-related disease; and CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/microl or > or = 200 cells/microl with severe HIV-related disease), and ART interruption/reintroduction thresholds (350/250; 500/350; and 700/500 cells/microl). First-line therapy was non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based and second-line therapy was protease inhibitor (PI)-based. RESULTS: STI generally reduced life expectancy compared with continuous ART. Life expectancy increased with earlier ART initiation and higher interruption/reintroduction thresholds. STI reduced life expectancy by 48-69 and 11-30 months compared with continuous ART when interruption/reintroduction thresholds were 350/250 and 500/350 cells/microl, depending on ART initiation criteria. When patients interrupted/reintroduced ART at 700/500 cells/microl, life expectancies ranged from 2 months lower to 1 month higher than continuous ART. STI-related life expectancy increased with decreased risk of virological resistance after ART interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: STI with NNRTI-based regimens was almost always less effective than continuous treatment, regardless of interruption/reintroduction thresholds. The risks associated with STI decrease only if patients start ART earlier, interrupt/reintroduce treatment at very high CD4+ T-cell thresholds (700/500 cells/microl) and use first-line medications with higher resistance barriers, such as PIs.
BACKGROUND: International trials have shown that CD4+ T-cell-guided structured treatment interruptions (STI) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) lead to worse outcomes than continuous treatment. We simulated continuous ART and STI strategies with higher CD4+ T-cell interruption/reintroduction thresholds than those assessed in actual trials. METHODS: Using a model of HIV, we simulated cohorts of African adults with different baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (< or = 200; 201-350; and 351-500 cells/microl). We varied ART initiation criteria (immediate; CD4+ T-cell count < 350 cells/microl or > or = 350 cells/microl with severe HIV-related disease; and CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/microl or > or = 200 cells/microl with severe HIV-related disease), and ART interruption/reintroduction thresholds (350/250; 500/350; and 700/500 cells/microl). First-line therapy was non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based and second-line therapy was protease inhibitor (PI)-based. RESULTS:STI generally reduced life expectancy compared with continuous ART. Life expectancy increased with earlier ART initiation and higher interruption/reintroduction thresholds. STI reduced life expectancy by 48-69 and 11-30 months compared with continuous ART when interruption/reintroduction thresholds were 350/250 and 500/350 cells/microl, depending on ART initiation criteria. When patients interrupted/reintroduced ART at 700/500 cells/microl, life expectancies ranged from 2 months lower to 1 month higher than continuous ART. STI-related life expectancy increased with decreased risk of virological resistance after ART interruptions. CONCLUSIONS:STI with NNRTI-based regimens was almost always less effective than continuous treatment, regardless of interruption/reintroduction thresholds. The risks associated with STI decrease only if patients start ART earlier, interrupt/reintroduce treatment at very high CD4+ T-cell thresholds (700/500 cells/microl) and use first-line medications with higher resistance barriers, such as PIs.
Authors: Y Mouton; S Alfandari; M Valette; F Cartier; P Dellamonica; G Humbert; J M Lang; P Massip; D Mechali; P Leclercq; J Modai; H Portier Journal: AIDS Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: J W Mellors; A Muñoz; J V Giorgi; J B Margolick; C J Tassoni; P Gupta; L A Kingsley; J A Todd; A J Saah; R Detels; J P Phair; C R Rinaldo Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1997-06-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: K A Freedberg; E Losina; M C Weinstein; A D Paltiel; C J Cohen; G R Seage; D E Craven; H Zhang; A D Kimmel; S J Goldie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joel E Gallant; Schlomo Staszewski; Anton L Pozniak; Edwin DeJesus; Jamal M A H Suleiman; Michael D Miller; Dion F Coakley; Biao Lu; John J Toole; Andrew K Cheng Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins; Kathryn Anastos; Joan Chmiel; Roger Detels; Carolyn Ervin; Joseph Feldman; Ruth Greenblatt; Lawrence Kingsley; Shenghan Lai; Mary Young; Mardge Cohen; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jens D Lundgren; Abdel Babiker; Wafaa El-Sadr; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; James D Neaton; Jacquie Neuhaus; Andrew N Phillips Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Nicole L De La Mata; Penh S Ly; Kinh V Nguyen; Tuti P Merati; Thuy T Pham; Man P Lee; Jun Y Choi; Jeremy Ross; Matthew G Law; Oon T Ng Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731