Literature DB >> 20516320

Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone.

Dirk Wähnert1, Konrad L Hoffmeier, Geert von Oldenburg, Rosemarie Fröber, Gunther O Hofmann, Thomas Mückley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fixation of distal femoral fractures remains a challenge, especially in osteoporotic bone. This study was performed to investigate the biomechanical stability of four different fixation devices for the treatment of comminuted distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone.
METHODS: Four fixation devices were investigated biomechanically under torsional and axial loading. Three intramedullary nails, differing in the mechanism of distal locking (with two lateral-to-medial screws in one construct, one screw and one spiral blade in another construct, and four screws [two oblique and two lateral-to-medial with medial nuts] in the third), and one angular stable plate were used. All constructs were tested in an osteoporotic synthetic bone model of an AO/ASIF type 33-C2 fracture. Two nail constructs (the one-screw and spiral blade construct and the four-screw construct) were also compared under axial loading in eight pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric femora.
RESULTS: The angular stable plate constructs had significantly higher torsional stiffness than the other constructs; the intramedullary nail with four-screw distal locking achieved nearly comparable results. Furthermore, the four-screw distal locking construct had the greatest torsional strength. Axial stiffness was also the highest for the four-screw distal locking device; the lowest values were achieved with the angular stable plate. The ranking of the constructs for axial cycles to failure was the four-screw locking construct, with the highest number of cycles, followed by the angular stable plate, the spiral blade construct, and two-screw fixation. The findings in the human cadaveric bone were comparable with those in the synthetic bone model. Failure modes under cyclic axial load were comparable for the synthetic and human bone models.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the concept that, for intramedullary nails, the kind of distal interlocking pattern affects the stabilization of distal femoral fractures. Four-screw distal locking provides the highest axial stability and nearly comparable torsional stability to that of the angular stable plate; the four-screw distal interlocking construct was found to have the best combined (torsional and axial) biomechanical stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20516320     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ulf Schmidt; Rainer Penzkofer; Samuel Bachmaier; Peter Augat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The antegrade angle-stable locking intramedullary nail for type-C distal femoral fractures: a thirty four case experience.

Authors:  Zhihui Zhao; Yi Li; Kifayat Ullah; Basanta Sapkota; Hongbin Bi; Yongqing Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A 3 year minimum follow up of Endoprosthetic replacement for distal femoral fractures - An alternative treatment option.

Authors:  A Atrey; N Hussain; O Gosling; P Giannoudis; A Shepherd; S Young; J Waite
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-01-10

4.  Nailing versus plating for comminuted fractures of the distal femur: a comparative biomechanical in vitro study of three implants.

Authors:  I Mehling; P Hoehle; W Sternstein; J Blum; P M Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Adam Z Khan; Richard D Rames; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?

Authors:  Jaclyn M Jankowski; Patrick F Szukics; Jay K Shah; David M Keller; Robinson E Pires; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Application of a double reverse traction repositor in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  Xiaodong Lian; Kuo Zhao; Wei Chen; Junzhe Zhang; Junyong Li; Hongyu Meng; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral medial condyle fracture nonunion.

Authors:  Takahiro Niikura; Sang Yang Lee; Yoshitada Sakai; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2015-03-13

9.  Implant augmentation: adding bone cement to improve the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study using human cadaver bones.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Julia Evers; Martin Schulze; Dominic Gehweiler; Martin Lakemeier; Michael J Raschke; Dirk Wähnert; Sabine Ochman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.