Literature DB >> 20516223

Toward an understanding of students' allocation of study time: why do they decide to mass or space their practice?

Mary A Pyc1, John Dunlosky.   

Abstract

Two recent studies have led to discrepant findings regarding students' decisions to mass or space practice of to-be-learned items: Son (2004) reported that participants chose to mass practice of difficult items more than that of easy items, whereas Benjamin and Bird (2006) reported the opposite. To resolve this apparent discrepancy, we had participants study items during an initial trial and then decide whether the next study trial would be massed or spaced. Across three experiments, we systematically varied factors that differed across these studies. In general, the participants more often chose to space than to mass practice, but they did favor massed practice when items were very difficult to learn. Moreover, although previous hypotheses implicated metamemory causes for these effects, the present results indicate that nonmetamemory causes are also responsible, such as using spaced practice as a default and deciding to mass practice for items that had not been fully perceived during an initial study trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20516223     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-12

2.  Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Gregory Zarow; Baylor Triplett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred?

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Michael S Cohen; Meghan L Davis; Amy C Moors
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Metacognition in motor learning.

Authors:  D A Simon; R A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

7.  Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy.

Authors:  Lisa K Son
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates.

Authors:  Jennifer McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

2.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

3.  Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Miko M Wilford; Nate Kornell; Kellie M Mullaney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.

Authors:  Fuyun Wang; Qiwen Qin; Yanju Jiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-03

5.  An In Vivo Study of Self-Regulated Study Sequencing in Introductory Psychology Courses.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; David W Braithwaite; Joshua R de Leeuw; Benjamin A Motz; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Self-regulated spacing in a massive open online course is related to better learning.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Faria Sana; Veronica X Yan
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.