OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of reduced spine bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), and to identify the main predictors of reduced spine BMAD in a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of the same large cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). There are few prospective data on bone mass evaluation in a large number of patients with JIA, and with enthesitis-related arthritis onset. METHODS: Two hundred nineteen patients with JIA (median age 8.7 yrs, range 6.1-13.1 yrs; 104 oligoarticular JIA, 61 polyarticular, 20 systemic, and 34 enthesitis-related arthritis onset) were retrospectively evaluated. A dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at the lumbar spine was performed in all subjects. Of these, 89 consecutive patients were followed up randomly and longitudinally with a second and a third DEXA evaluation. The data obtained were compared with 80 age-matched and sex-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: At the first DEXA, patients with JIA showed a reduced spine BMAD standard deviation score (SDS) in comparison to controls (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed when the subjects were divided into JIA subtypes (p < 0.005) with the exception of enthesitis-related arthritis onset. Spine BMAD SDS significantly correlated with JIA onset type (p < 0.01), age at JIA onset (p < 0.005), and flares (p = 0.008). The longitudinal evaluation showed that spine BMAD SDS did not significantly improve at the followup in comparison to controls, in all subsets with JIA except for systemic onset (p < 0.05). Spine BMAD correlated with sex (p < 0.01), systemic corticosteroid exposure (p < 0.01), the number of intraarticular corticosteroid injections (p < 0.01), the interval from last steroid injection (p < 0.05), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p < 0.005), and C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients with JIA have a low bone mass and, after a first increase due to therapy, do not reach a healthy condition over time despite our current more effective drugs. These patients have a high risk of osteoporosis in early adulthood. To reduce the risk and improve the bone mass, close monitoring of bone mineral density, better control of disease activity, physical activity, and intake of calcium and vitamin D are recommended. In patients with osteoporosis, therapeutic approaches including bisphosphonates should be considered.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of reduced spine bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), and to identify the main predictors of reduced spine BMAD in a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of the same large cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). There are few prospective data on bone mass evaluation in a large number of patients with JIA, and with enthesitis-related arthritis onset. METHODS: Two hundred nineteen patients with JIA (median age 8.7 yrs, range 6.1-13.1 yrs; 104 oligoarticular JIA, 61 polyarticular, 20 systemic, and 34 enthesitis-related arthritis onset) were retrospectively evaluated. A dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at the lumbar spine was performed in all subjects. Of these, 89 consecutive patients were followed up randomly and longitudinally with a second and a third DEXA evaluation. The data obtained were compared with 80 age-matched and sex-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: At the first DEXA, patients with JIA showed a reduced spine BMAD standard deviation score (SDS) in comparison to controls (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed when the subjects were divided into JIA subtypes (p < 0.005) with the exception of enthesitis-related arthritis onset. Spine BMAD SDS significantly correlated with JIA onset type (p < 0.01), age at JIA onset (p < 0.005), and flares (p = 0.008). The longitudinal evaluation showed that spine BMAD SDS did not significantly improve at the followup in comparison to controls, in all subsets with JIA except for systemic onset (p < 0.05). Spine BMAD correlated with sex (p < 0.01), systemic corticosteroid exposure (p < 0.01), the number of intraarticular corticosteroid injections (p < 0.01), the interval from last steroid injection (p < 0.05), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p < 0.005), and C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION:Patients with JIA have a low bone mass and, after a first increase due to therapy, do not reach a healthy condition over time despite our current more effective drugs. These patients have a high risk of osteoporosis in early adulthood. To reduce the risk and improve the bone mass, close monitoring of bone mineral density, better control of disease activity, physical activity, and intake of calcium and vitamin D are recommended. In patients with osteoporosis, therapeutic approaches including bisphosphonates should be considered.
Authors: Celia Rodd; Bianca Lang; Timothy Ramsay; Nathalie Alos; Adam M Huber; David A Cabral; Rosie Scuccimarri; Paivi M Miettunen; Johannes Roth; Stephanie A Atkinson; Robert Couch; Elizabeth A Cummings; Peter B Dent; Janet Ellsworth; John Hay; Kristin Houghton; Roman Jurencak; Maggie Larché; Claire LeBlanc; Kiem Oen; Claire Saint-Cyr; Robert Stein; David Stephure; Shayne Taback; Brian Lentle; Maryann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; David Moher; Frank Rauch; Kerry Siminoski; Leanne M Ward Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Janneke Anink; Charlotte M Nusman; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Rick R van Rijn; Mario Maas; Marion A J van Rossum Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: P C E Hissink Muller; W G van Braak; D Schreurs; C M Nusman; S A Bergstra; R Hemke; D Schonenberg-Meinema; J M van den Berg; T W Kuijpers; Y Koopman-Keemink; M A J van Rossum; L W A van Suijlekom-Smit; D M C Brinkman; C F Allaart; R Ten Cate; M Maas Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Maciej K Stawicki; Paweł Abramowicz; Adrian Góralczyk; Justyna Młyńczyk; Anna Kondratiuk; Jerzy Konstantynowicz Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: R V Munekata; M T R A Terreri; O A B Peracchi; C Len; M Lazaretti-Castro; R O S Sarni; M O E Hilário Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 2.590