BACKGROUND: The adverse health and environmental effects of poor housing quality are well established. A central requirement for evidence-based policies and programmes to improve housing standards is a valid, reliable and practical way of measuring housing quality that is supported by policy agencies, the housing sector, researchers and the public. METHODS: This paper provides guidance on the development of housing quality-assessment tools that link practical measures of housing conditions to their effects on health, safety and sustainability, with particular reference to tools developed in New Zealand and England. RESULTS: The authors describe how information on housing quality can support individuals, agencies and the private sector to make worthwhile improvements to the health, safety and sustainability of housing. The information gathered and the resultant tools developed should be guided by the multiple purposes and end users of this information. Other important issues outlined include deciding on the scope, detailed content, practical administration issues and how the information will be analysed and summarised for its intended end users. There are likely to be considerable benefits from increased international collaboration and standardisation of approaches to measuring housing hazards. At the same time, these assessment approaches need to consider local factors such as climate, geography, culture, predominating building practices, important housing-related health issues and existing building codes. CONCLUSIONS: An effective housing quality-assessment tool has a central role in supporting improvements to housing. The issues discussed in this paper are designed to motivate and assist the development of such tools.
BACKGROUND: The adverse health and environmental effects of poor housing quality are well established. A central requirement for evidence-based policies and programmes to improve housing standards is a valid, reliable and practical way of measuring housing quality that is supported by policy agencies, the housing sector, researchers and the public. METHODS: This paper provides guidance on the development of housing quality-assessment tools that link practical measures of housing conditions to their effects on health, safety and sustainability, with particular reference to tools developed in New Zealand and England. RESULTS: The authors describe how information on housing quality can support individuals, agencies and the private sector to make worthwhile improvements to the health, safety and sustainability of housing. The information gathered and the resultant tools developed should be guided by the multiple purposes and end users of this information. Other important issues outlined include deciding on the scope, detailed content, practical administration issues and how the information will be analysed and summarised for its intended end users. There are likely to be considerable benefits from increased international collaboration and standardisation of approaches to measuring housing hazards. At the same time, these assessment approaches need to consider local factors such as climate, geography, culture, predominating building practices, important housing-related health issues and existing building codes. CONCLUSIONS: An effective housing quality-assessment tool has a central role in supporting improvements to housing. The issues discussed in this paper are designed to motivate and assist the development of such tools.
Authors: Carol E Adair; Brianna Kopp; Jino Distasio; Stephen W Hwang; Jennifer Lavoie; Scott Veldhuizen; Jijian Voronka; Andrew F Kaufman; Julian M Somers; Stefanie R LeBlanc; Sonia Cote; Sindi Addorisio; Dominique Matte; Paula Goering Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Carol E Adair; Brianna Kopp; Jennifer Lavoie; Jino Distasio; Stephen W Hwang; Aimee Watson; Scott Veldhuizen; Katherine Chislett; Jijian Voronka; Muznah Ahmad; Naveed Ahmed; Paula Goering Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Rima R Habib; Diana Mikati; Safa Hojeij; Khalil El Asmar; Monique Chaaya; Rami Zurayk Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Tristram Ingham; Michael Keall; Bernadette Jones; Daniel R T Aldridge; Anthony C Dowell; Cheryl Davies; Julian Crane; Jessica Barbara Draper; Lauren Olivia Bailey; Helen Viggers; Thorsten Villiers Stanley; Philip Leadbitter; Mereana Latimer; Philippa Howden-Chapman Journal: Thorax Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Michael D Keall; Julian Crane; Michael G Baker; Kristin Wickens; Philippa Howden-Chapman; Malcolm Cunningham Journal: Environ Health Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Mathieu Roy; Mélissa Généreux; Emélie Laverdière; Alain Vanasse Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lucy Telfar-Barnard; Julie Bennett; Philippa Howden-Chapman; David E Jacobs; David Ormandy; Matthew Cutler-Welsh; Nicholas Preval; Michael G Baker; Michael Keall Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 3.390