PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)/Taqman copy number assay (CNA) CYP2D6 genotyping by AmpliChip CYP450 Test for the prediction of tamoxifen metabolizer phenotypes in breast cancer, and to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 variant coverage on genotype-phenotype relationships and tamoxifen outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients (n = 492) treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, previously analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS/CNA, were reanalyzed by AmpliChip CYP450 Test and validated by independent methods. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for recurrence of poor (PM) relative to extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotypes with increasing numbers of CYP2D6 variants. Kaplan-Meier distributions were calculated for different phenotype classifications. RESULTS: Concordance was 99.2% to 99.5% for CNA and 99.8% to 100% per CYP2D6 allele (*3, *4, *5, *9, *10, and *41). The prevalence of predicted phenotypes was 1.2% for ultrarapid metabolizer (UM), 37.2% for EM without variant, 43.5% for heterozygous EM, 9.7% for intermediate metabolizer (IM), and 8.3% for PM. Approximately, one third of patients were misclassified based on a *4 analysis only, but inclusion of all reduced-function alleles increased the PM-associated HR from 1.33 (P = 0.58) to 2.87 (P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed highest and lowest clinical benefit for UM and PM with respect to both the AmpliChip-based and a redefined phenotype assignment. The latter revealed significant allele-dose-dependent associations (P = 0.011) and largest effect size (HR(PM_EM) = 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-5.89). CONCLUSIONS: MALDI-TOF MS/CNA is suitable for accurate CYP2D6 genotyping. For tamoxifen pharmacogenetics, broad CYP2D6 allele coverage is recommended to reduce phenotype misclassification. Classification based on refined EM and reduced-function metabolizers is advisable. AACR.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)/Taqman copy number assay (CNA) CYP2D6 genotyping by AmpliChip CYP450 Test for the prediction of tamoxifen metabolizer phenotypes in breast cancer, and to investigate the influence of CYP2D6 variant coverage on genotype-phenotype relationships and tamoxifen outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancerpatients (n = 492) treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, previously analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS/CNA, were reanalyzed by AmpliChip CYP450 Test and validated by independent methods. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for recurrence of poor (PM) relative to extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotypes with increasing numbers of CYP2D6 variants. Kaplan-Meier distributions were calculated for different phenotype classifications. RESULTS: Concordance was 99.2% to 99.5% for CNA and 99.8% to 100% per CYP2D6 allele (*3, *4, *5, *9, *10, and *41). The prevalence of predicted phenotypes was 1.2% for ultrarapid metabolizer (UM), 37.2% for EM without variant, 43.5% for heterozygous EM, 9.7% for intermediate metabolizer (IM), and 8.3% for PM. Approximately, one third of patients were misclassified based on a *4 analysis only, but inclusion of all reduced-function alleles increased the PM-associated HR from 1.33 (P = 0.58) to 2.87 (P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed highest and lowest clinical benefit for UM and PM with respect to both the AmpliChip-based and a redefined phenotype assignment. The latter revealed significant allele-dose-dependent associations (P = 0.011) and largest effect size (HR(PM_EM) = 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-5.89). CONCLUSIONS: MALDI-TOF MS/CNA is suitable for accurate CYP2D6 genotyping. For tamoxifen pharmacogenetics, broad CYP2D6 allele coverage is recommended to reduce phenotype misclassification. Classification based on refined EM and reduced-function metabolizers is advisable. AACR.
Authors: Hiltrud Brauch; Werner Schroth; Matthew P Goetz; Thomas E Mürdter; Stefan Winter; James N Ingle; Matthias Schwab; Michel Eichelbaum Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joanne S L Lim; Xiang A Chen; Onkar Singh; Yoon S Yap; Raymond C H Ng; Nan S Wong; Mabel Wong; Edmund J D Lee; Balram Chowbay Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: P A Fasching; S Y Brucker; T N Fehm; F Overkamp; W Janni; M Wallwiener; P Hadji; E Belleville; L Häberle; F-A Taran; D Lüftner; M P Lux; J Ettl; V Müller; H Tesch; D Wallwiener; A Schneeweiss Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Thomas P Ahern; Lindsay J Collin; James W Baurley; Anders Kjærsgaard; Rebecca Nash; Maret L Maliniak; Per Damkier; Michael E Zwick; R Benjamin Isett; Peer M Christiansen; Bent Ejlertsen; Kristina L Lauridsen; Kristina B Christensen; Rebecca A Silliman; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Trine Tramm; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit; Timothy L Lash; Deirdre Cronin-Fenton Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 4.254