Literature DB >> 2051555

Osmotic load from glucose polymers.

W W Koo1, D Poh, M Leong, Y K Tam, P Succop, E G Checkland.   

Abstract

Glucose polymer is a carbohydrate source with variable chain lengths of glucose units which may result in variable osmolality. The osmolality of two commercial glucose polymers was measured in reconstituted powder infant formulas, and the change in osmolality of infant milk formulas at the same increases in energy density (67 kcal/dL to 81 and 97 kcal/dL) from the use of additional milk powder or glucose polymers was compared. All samples were prepared from powders (to nearest 0.1 mg), and osmolality was measured by freezing point depression. For both glucose polymers the within-batch variability of the measured osmolality was less than 3.5%, and between-batch variability of the measured osmolality was less than 9.6%. The measured osmolality varies linearly with energy density (p less than 0.001) and was highest in infant formula reconstituted from milk powder alone. However, there exist significant differences in the measured osmolality between different glucose polymer preparations. At high energy densities (greater than or equal to 97 kcal/dL), infant milk formulas prepared with milk powder alone or with the addition of certain glucose polymer preparation may have high osmolality (greater than or equal to 450 mosm/kg) and theoretically predispose the infant to complications of hyperosmotic feeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2051555     DOI: 10.1177/0148607191015002144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  2 in total

Review 1.  Infant food applications of complex carbohydrates: Structure, synthesis, and function.

Authors:  Dorothy L Ackerman; Kelly M Craft; Steven D Townsend
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Target Fortification of Breast Milk: Predicting the Final Osmolality of the Feeds.

Authors:  Arum Choi; Gerhard Fusch; Niels Rochow; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.