Literature DB >> 20515384

Difficult decisions for progress testing: how much and how often?

Chris Ricketts1, Adrian Freeman, Giovanni Pagliuca, Lee Coombes, Julian Archer.   

Abstract

This article is primarily an opinion piece which aims to encourage debate and future research. There is little theoretical or practical research on how best to design progress tests. We propose that progress test designers should be clear about the primary purpose of their assessment. We provide some empirical evidence about reliability and cost based upon generalisability theory. We suggest that the future research is needed in the areas of educational impact and acceptability.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515384     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  2 in total

1.  Identifying low test-taking effort during low-stakes tests with the new Test-taking Effort Short Scale (TESS) - development and psychometrics.

Authors:  Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns; Martina Kadmon; Claudia Kiessling; Yassin Karay; Margarita Gestmann; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  The use of progress testing.

Authors:  Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.