Literature DB >> 20515375

Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test.

Stefan Schauber1, Zineb M Nouns.   

Abstract

The Berlin Progress Test has grown to a cooperation of 13 universities. Recently, comparisons between the participating schools became an area of high interest. Muijtjens et al. [Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, Thoben AJNM, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008a. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test. Med Educ 41(1):82-88; Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008b. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Adv Health Sci Educ 13:593-605] proposed a method for cross-institutional benchmarking based on progress test data. Progress testing has some major advantages as it delivers longitudinal information about student's growth of knowledge. By adopting the procedure of Muijtjens et al. ( 2008a , b), we were able to replicate the basic characteristics of the cumulative deviation method. Besides the advantages of the method, there are some difficulties as errors of measurement are not independent, which violates the premises of testing statistical differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515375     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  The use of progress testing.

Authors:  Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-10

2.  Knowledge assessment of trainees and trainers in general practice in a neighboring country. Making a case for international collaboration.

Authors:  Roy Remmen; Johan Wens; Annelies Damen; Herman Duesman; Veronique Verhoeven
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  First reported implementation of a German-language progress test in an undergraduate dental curriculum: A prospective study.

Authors:  B Kirnbauer; A Avian; N Jakse; P Rugani; D Ithaler; R Egger
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.355

4.  Exploring pooled analysis of pretested items to monitor the performance of medical students exposed to different curriculum designs.

Authors:  Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho; Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção; Joélcio Francisco Abbade; Dario Cecílio-Fernandes; Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori; Angélica Maria Bicudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.