Literature DB >> 20515251

When inequality matters: the effect of inequality frames on academic engagement.

Brian S Lowery1, Daryl A Wout.   

Abstract

Research indicates that, among women and ethnic minorities, perceived inequality reduces the association between self-esteem and academic outcomes. The present studies demonstrate that the perception of social inequality does not always induce subordinate-group disengagement. Rather, inequality framed as dominant-group advantage allows subordinate groups to remain engaged and causes dominant groups to disengage. Experiments 1-3 demonstrate that academic inequality framed in terms of ingroup disadvantage causes Black, Latino, and female students to disengage, but inequality framed in terms of White or male advantage does not. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate the same effect for Whites and men--inequality framed in terms of the ingroup (i.e., advantage) causes disengagement, but inequality framed as outgroup disadvantage does not. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515251     DOI: 10.1037/a0017926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  4 in total

1.  Chronic frames of social inequality: How mainstream media frame race, gender, and wealth inequality.

Authors:  Sora Jun; Rosalind M Chow; A Maurits van der Veen; Erik Bleich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  The White ceiling heuristic and the underestimation of Asian-American income.

Authors:  Chris C Martin; John B Nezlek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Perceptions of Economic Inequality in Colombian Daily Life: More Than Unequal Distribution of Economic Resources.

Authors:  Efraín García-Sánchez; Guillermo B Willis; Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón; Juan Diego García-Castro; Jorge Palacio-Sañudo; Jean Polo; Erico Rentería-Pérez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  How the term "white privilege" affects participation, polarization, and content in online communication.

Authors:  Christopher L Quarles; Lia Bozarth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.