Literature DB >> 20515079

Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review.

Jaume Puig-Junoy1.   

Abstract

Although economic theory indicates that it should not be necessary to intervene in the generic drug market through price regulation, most EU countries intervene in this market, both by regulating the maximum sale price of generics (price cap) and by setting the maximum reimbursement rate, especially by means of reference pricing systems. We analyse current knowledge of the impact of direct price-cap regulation of generic drugs and the implementation of systems regulating the reimbursement rate, particularly through reference pricing and similar tools, on dynamic price competition between generic competitors in Europe. A literature search was carried out in the EconLit and PubMed databases, and on Google Scholar. The search included papers published in English or Spanish between January 2000 and July 2009. Inclusion criteria included that studies had to present empirical results of a quantitative nature for EU countries of the impact of price capping and/or regulation of the reimbursement rate (reference pricing or similar systems) on price dynamics, corresponding to pharmacy sales, in the generic drug market. The available evidence indicates that price-cap regulation leads to a levelling off of generic prices at a higher level than would occur in the absence of this regulation. Reference pricing systems cause an obvious and almost compulsory reduction in the consumer price of all pharmaceuticals subject to this system, to a varying degree in different countries and periods, the reduction being greater for originator-branded drugs than for generics. In several countries with a reference pricing system, it was observed that generics with a consumer price lower than the reference price do not undergo price reductions until the reference price is reduced, even when there are other lower-priced generics on the market (absence of price competition below the reference price). Beyond the price reduction forced by the price-cap and/or reference pricing regulation itself, the entry of new generic competitors is useful for lowering the real transaction price of purchases made by pharmacies (dynamic price competition at ex-factory level), although this effect is weaker or non-significant for official ex-factory prices and consumer prices in some countries. When maximum reimbursement systems such as reference pricing or similar types are applied, pharmacies are seen to receive large discounts on the price they pay for the pharmaceuticals, although these discounts are not transferred to the consumer price. The percentage discount offered to pharmacies in a country that uses a price-cap system combined with reference pricing is positively and significantly related to the number of generic competitors in the market for the pharmaceutical (dynamic price competition at ex-factory level).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515079     DOI: 10.2165/11535360-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  18 in total

1.  Do pharmaceutical prices respond to potential patient out-of-pocket expenses?

Authors:  Nina Pavenik
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2002

2.  Dynamic competition in pharmaceuticals. Patent expiry, generic penetration, and industry structure.

Authors:  Laura Magazzini; Fabio Pammolli; Massimo Riccaboni
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-06

3.  Drug costs developments after patent expiry of enalapril, fluoxetine and ranitidine: a study conducted for the Netherlands.

Authors:  Cornelis Boersma; Rogier M Klok; Jasper M Bos; Mark Naunton; Paul B van den Berg; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 4.  What is required to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical reference pricing?

Authors:  Jaume Puig-Junoy
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Do generics offer significant savings to the UK National Health Service?

Authors:  Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  International comparison of generic medicine prices.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Do policy changes in the pharmaceutical reimbursement schedule affect drug expenditures? Interrupted time series analysis of cost, volume and cost per volume trends in Sweden 1986-2002.

Authors:  Karolina Andersson; Max Gustav Petzold; Christian Sonesson; Knut Lönnroth; Anders Carlsten
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Having your cake and eating it: office of fair trading proposal for funding new drugs to benefit patients and innovative companies.

Authors:  Brian Godman; Alan Haycox; Ulrich Schwabe; Roberta Joppi; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Soft regulations in pharmaceutical policy making: an overview of current approaches and their consequences.

Authors:  Björn Wettermark; Brian Godman; Bengt Jacobsson; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.561

10.  Trends in generic prescribing and dispensing in Europe.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.045

View more
  22 in total

1.  Projecting expenditure on medicines in the UK NHS.

Authors:  Phill O'Neill; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Ruth Puig-Peiro; Jon Sussex
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Does the market share of generic medicines influence the price level?: a European analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Dylst; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Prevalence of self-medication and associated factors in an elderly population: a systematic review.

Authors:  Javier Jerez-Roig; Lucas F B Medeiros; Victor A B Silva; Camila L P A M Bezerra; Leandro A R Cavalcante; Grasiela Piuvezam; Dyego L B Souza
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Reforming the Swedish pharmaceuticals market: consequences for costs per defined daily dose.

Authors:  Mats A Bergman; David Granlund; Niklas Rudholm
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-02-08

Review 5.  Changing the cost of care for chronic myeloid leukemia: the availability of generic imatinib in the USA and the EU.

Authors:  Rena M Conti; William V Padula; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Generic vs brand originator alendronate: analysis of persistence and compliance in five Local Healthcare Units in the Lombardy Region of Italy.

Authors:  Giorgio L Colombo; Carlo Maurizio Montecucco
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Comparing pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies in Croatia to the European Union Member States.

Authors:  Sabine Vogler; Claudia Habl; Martina Bogut; Luka Voncina
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 8.  Ontario's plunging price-caps on generics: deeper dives may drown some drugs.

Authors:  Aslam Anis; Stephanie Harvard; Carlo Marra
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2011-09-27

Review 9.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.

Authors:  Angela Acosta; Agustín Ciapponi; Morten Aaserud; Valeria Vietto; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Jan Peter Kösters; Claudia Vacca; Manuel Machado; Diana Hazbeydy Diaz Ayala; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-16

Review 10.  A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study.

Authors:  Suzanne Dunne; Bill Shannon; Colum Dunne; Walter Cullen
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.