Literature DB >> 20514125

First, do no harm: how routine interventions, common restrictions, and the organization of our health-care system affect the health of mothers and newborns.

Amy M Romano1.   

Abstract

In this column, the author reprises recent selections from the Lamaze International research blog, Science & Sensibility. Each selection discusses a new study that demonstrates the "First, do no harm" principle in a different way. New research on the potentially harmful effects of intravenous lines demonstrates that refraining from routine interventions in labor protects the safety of women and babies. A new systematic review of movement and position changes in labor shows that eliminating unfounded restrictions also protects maternal and infant health and well-being. Finally, a study of patterns of use of neonatal intensive care units reveals how the organization of the maternity care system itself can affect the health outcomes of its beneficiaries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulation in labor; childbirth education; intravenous lines; labor pain; labor progress; natural birth; neonatal intensive care units

Year:  2009        PMID: 20514125      PMCID: PMC2730908          DOI: 10.1624/105812409X461243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN: 1058-1243


  13 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Step 6: does not routinely employ practices, procedures unsupported by scientific evidence: the coalition for improving maternity services:.

Authors:  Henci Goer; Mayri Sagady Leslie; Amy Romano
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

3.  Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement.

Authors:  Elliott K Main; Dan Moore; Bill Farrell; Leon D Schimmel; Robert J Altman; Carol Abrahams; Mary Campbell Bliss; Laurie Polivy; Jacci Sterling
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Impact of sociodemographic and hospital factors on attempts at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Mary Sammel; Erika Stevens; Jeffrey L Peipert; George Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Carol Sakala; Maureen P Corry; Sandra Applebaum
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

6.  Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery.

Authors:  S L Bloom; D D McIntire; M A Kelly; H L Beimer; R H Burpo; M A Garcia; K J Leveno
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Episiotomy use among residents and faculty compared with private practitioners.

Authors:  Nancy L S Howden; Anne M Weber; Leslie A Meyn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Cyclohexanone contamination from extracorporeal circuits impairs cardiovascular function.

Authors:  Caitlin S Thompson-Torgerson; Hunter C Champion; Lakshmi Santhanam; Z Leah Harris; Artin A Shoukas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  The influence of level of care on admission to neonatal care for babies of low-risk nullipara.

Authors:  C Le Ray; J Zeitlin; P H Jarreau; G Bréart; F Goffinet
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 10.  Update on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering.

Authors:  Penny Simkin; April Bolding
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.