Literature DB >> 2051392

Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report.

I Naert1, M Quirynen, G Theuniers, D van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

Eighty-six consecutive patients, provided with 84 resilient and two nonresilient overdentures (six in the upper and 80 in the lower jaw), were examined. The overdentures were supported by a total of 173 osseointegrated titanium fixtures (the standard Branemark abutment), with a mean loading time of 19.1 months (range 4 to 48 months). In each jaw only two fixtures anchored the overdentures. No failures occurred during the observation period but two fixtures were lost before loading. The radiographic annual bone loss around fixtures in the lower jaw was -0.8 mm for the first year and less than -0.1 mm for the following years. The change in marginal bone height did not correlate with parameters such as the occlusion and articulation pattern, the presence or absence of a soft liner around the abutments, and the magnitude of the interabutment distance. The patients' reactions to overdenture treatment were, on the whole, positive concerning chewing function, phonetics, and comfort. The need for maintenance care of the clip-bar attachment was minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2051392     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90205-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  11 in total

1.  Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with implant-supported overdenture using ball attachments and healing abutments: A case report.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-10-29

2.  Retentive characteristics of a vinylpolysiloxane overdenture attachment system.

Authors:  Ramona Schweyen; Florian Beuer; Christian Arnold; Jeremias Hey
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Clinical evaluation of overdenture retention using indigenous dental implants.

Authors:  M C Sharma; Vimal Arora
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-10-01

4.  A study on the changes in attractive force of magnetic attachments for overdenture.

Authors:  Han-Wool Leem; In-Ho Cho; Jong-Hyuk Lee; Yu-Sung Choi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Comparison of three attachments in implant-tissue supported overdentures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  F Tabatabaian; F Alaie; K Seyedan
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-09-30

6.  A prospective study of early loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: preliminary one-year results.

Authors:  Ali M El-Sheikh; Omar F Shihabuddin; Sahar M F Ghoraba
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-03-15

7.  The Effects of Denture Cleansing Solutions on the Retention of Attachments of Implant Supported Overdentures.

Authors:  Reza Derafshi; Mina Mohaghegh; Maryam Saki; Anahita Safari; Mohammad Rabee Haghighi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-03

8.  The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Farhad Tabatabaian; Abolfazl Saboury; Zahra Sadat Sobhani; Vicki C Petropoulos
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  Implant supported overdenture in the patients with history of radio and chemotherapy for the prostate malignancy.

Authors:  Himanshu Aeran; Vijay Nautiyal; Varun Kumar; Shashank Uniyal
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

10.  Fabrication of new restorations with a consideration of oral hygiene.

Authors:  Swati Ahuja; Russell Wicks; Audrey Selecman
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.