Literature DB >> 20513827

Sex, age, and birth cohort effects in colorectal neoplasms: a cohort analysis.

Hermann Brenner1, Lutz Altenhofen, Michael Hoffmeister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms increases with age and is higher among men than women. Cross-sectional analyses estimated that men reach an equivalent prevalence at a much younger age than women. However, cross-sectional estimates may be confounded by birth cohort effects.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate age and cohort effects in advanced colorectal neoplasms and to adjust risk-advancement periods for men compared with women for birth cohort effects.
DESIGN: Age-cohort analyses.
SETTING: German screening colonoscopy program, 2003 to 2007. PARTICIPANTS: 2 185 153 participants aged 55 to 75 years. MEASUREMENTS: Sex- and age-specific prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasms (CRC or advanced adenoma) were plotted with and without stratification by birth cohort. Risk-advancement periods with 95% CI for men compared with women were estimated from log-binomial regression models with and without cross-sectional analysis adjustment for birth cohort effects.
RESULTS: Overall, 17 196 participants (0.8%) had CRC and 152 429 (7.0%) had any advanced neoplasm. Age-specific prevalence was higher in men than in women and in later birth cohorts. The apparent modest increase in prevalence by age in cross-sectional analysis was much steeper after birth cohort effects were controlled for. In cross-sectional analysis, risk-advancement periods (95% CI) for men compared with women were 8.4 years (CI, 7.7 to 9.0 years) and 16.1 years (CI, 15.8 to 16.5 years) for CRC and any advanced neoplasm, respectively, and 3.4 years (CI, 2.6 to 4.3 years) and 6.9 years (CI, 6.4 to 7.4 years) after controlling for birth cohort effects. LIMITATION: Information on covariates that could explain cohort effects was lacking.
CONCLUSION: In this population, strong cohort effects reduced age gradients in advanced colorectal neoplasms and inflated risk-advancement periods for men compared with women, but major risk advancement persisted, even after birth cohort effects were controlled for. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513827     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  14 in total

1.  A study of the frequency of methylation of gene promoter regions in colorectal cancer in the Taiwanese population.

Authors:  Chang-Chieh Wu; Jen-Chun Kuan; Chih-Hsiung Hsu; Tzu-An Chen; Chien-An Sun; Tsan Yang; Shinn-Long Lin; Yu-Ching Chou
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  [Screening for colorectal cancer. Current evidence and novel developments].

Authors:  F T Kolligs
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Eight years of colonoscopic bowel cancer screening in Germany: initial findings and projections.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Lutz Altenhofen; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women.

Authors:  Lyssa Chacko; Carole Macaron; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Role of endoglin and VEGF family expression in colorectal cancer prognosis and anti-angiogenic therapies.

Authors:  Sandra F Martins; Rui M Reis; Antonio Mesquita Rodrigues; Fátima Baltazar; Adhemar Longatto Filho
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-10

6.  Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Chloe Thomas; Sophie Whyte; James Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.558

7.  Dietary habits of colorectal neoplasia patients in comparison to their first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Ivana Mikoviny Kajzrlikova; Petr Vitek; Josef Chalupa; Petr Dite
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Catherine L Saunders; Deborah Thompson; Sophie Whyte; Simon Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Chiang; Yi-Chia Lee; Wan-Chung Liao; Jui-Hung Chung; Han-Mo Chiu; Chia-Hung Tu; Su-Chiu Chen; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Colorectal polyp model established by transplacental BMP4 RNAi.

Authors:  Xin Jin; Zhongmei Chen; Li Xiang; Qing Luo; Zhenghua Guo; Xionghui Ding; Xianqing Jin
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.