Literature DB >> 20513790

Development of trigger tools for surveillance of adverse events in ambulatory surgery.

Haytham M A Kaafarani1, Amy K Rosen, Jonathan R Nebeker, Stephanie Shimada, Hillary J Mull, Peter E Rivard, Lucy Savitz, Amy Helwig, Marlena H Shin, Kamal M F Itani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The trigger tool methodology uses clinical algorithms applied electronically to 'flag' medical records where adverse events (AEs) have most likely occurred. The authors sought to create surgical triggers to detect AEs in the ambulatory care setting.
METHODS: Four consecutive steps were used to develop ambulatory surgery triggers. First, the authors conducted a comprehensive literature review for surgical triggers. Second, a series of multidisciplinary focus groups (physicians, nurses, pharmacists and information technology specialists) provided user input on trigger selection. Third, a clinical advisory panel designed an initial set of 10 triggers. Finally, a three-phase Delphi process (surgical and trigger tool experts) evaluated and rated the suggested triggers.
RESULTS: The authors designed an initial set of 10 surgical triggers including five global triggers (flagging medical records for the suspicion of any AE) and five AE-specific triggers (flagging medical records for the suspicion of specific AEs). Based on the Delphi rating of the trigger's utility for system-level interventions, the final triggers were: (1) emergency room visit(s) within 21 days from surgery; (2) unscheduled readmission within 30 days from surgery; (3) unscheduled procedure (interventional radiological, urological, dental, cardiac or gastroenterological) or reoperation within 30 days from surgery; (4) unplanned initial hospital length of stay more than 24 h; and (5) lower-extremity Doppler ultrasound order entry and ICD code for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus within 30 days from surgery.
CONCLUSION: The authors therefore propose a systematic methodology to develop trigger tools that takes into consideration previously published work, end-user preferences and expert opinion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513790     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  14 in total

1.  Development of a trigger tool for the detection of adverse drug events in Chinese geriatric inpatients using the Delphi method.

Authors:  Qiaozhi Hu; Zhou Qin; Mei Zhan; Bin Wu; Zhaoyan Chen; Ting Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-06-28

2.  Development of a 'ready-to-use' tool that includes preventability, for the assessment of adverse drug events in oncology.

Authors:  Guillaume Hébert; Florence Netzer; Sylvain Landry Kouakou; François Lemare; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-02-14

3.  Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Ashley N D Meyer; Daniel R Murphy; Aymer Al-Mutairi; Dean F Sittig; Li Wei; Elise Russo; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Development of an Adverse Event Surveillance Model for Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Kamal M F Itani; Steven D Pizer; Martin P Charns; Peter E Rivard; Nathalie McIntosh; Mary T Hawn; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Ashley N D Meyer; Viralkumar Vaghani; Elise Russo; Dean F Sittig; Kyle A Richards; Li Wei; Louis Wu; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Traber Davis Giardina; Samuel N Forjuoh; Michael D Reis; Steven Kosmach; Myrna M Khan; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Development and testing of tools to detect ambulatory surgical adverse events.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Ann M Borzecki; Kathleen Hickson; Kamal M F Itani; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward.

Authors:  Brian M Wong; Sonia Dyal; Edward E Etchells; Sandra Knowles; Lauren Gerard; Artemis Diamantouros; Rajin Mehta; Barbara Liu; G Ross Baker; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 9.  Tools for primary care patient safety: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rachel Spencer; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Strengths and weaknesses of working with the Global Trigger Tool method for retrospective record review: focus group interviews with team members.

Authors:  Kristina Schildmeijer; Lena Nilsson; Joep Perk; Kristofer Arestedt; Gunilla Nilsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.