OBJECTIVE: The U.S. military conducts health screenings of service members three to six months after they return from combat deployments. This population health program includes a modified version of the Two-Item Conjoint Screen (TICS), which is widely used in primary care to screen for alcohol misuse. Rates of referral in the military for alcohol treatment are very low, and the utility of these screening questions in predicting serious alcohol-related behaviors is unknown. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were collected from 6,527 U.S. Army soldiers who were screened three to four months after returning from deployment to Iraq. Positive responses on the TICS alcohol screen were correlated with alcohol-related behaviors. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression, after adjusting for gender, rank, race, and military component (active or reserve). RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of soldiers screened positive for alcohol misuse. Compared with soldiers who screened negative, those who screened positive were more likely to have recently engaged in the following behaviors: drinking and driving (OR=4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.31-5.76), riding with a driver who had been drinking (OR=5.87, CI=4.99-6.91), reporting late or missing work because of a hangover (OR=9.24, CI=6.73-12.68), using illicit drugs (OR=4.97, CI=3.68-6.71), being referred to alcohol rehabilitation (OR=7.15, CI=4.84-10.58), and being convicted of driving under the influence (OR=4.84, CI=3.04-7.67). CONCLUSIONS: Positive responses to a two-item alcohol screening tool were strongly associated with serious alcohol-related behaviors. This study highlights the need to improve screening and access to care for alcohol-related problems among service members returning from combat deployments.
OBJECTIVE: The U.S. military conducts health screenings of service members three to six months after they return from combat deployments. This population health program includes a modified version of the Two-Item Conjoint Screen (TICS), which is widely used in primary care to screen for alcohol misuse. Rates of referral in the military for alcohol treatment are very low, and the utility of these screening questions in predicting serious alcohol-related behaviors is unknown. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were collected from 6,527 U.S. Army soldiers who were screened three to four months after returning from deployment to Iraq. Positive responses on the TICS alcohol screen were correlated with alcohol-related behaviors. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression, after adjusting for gender, rank, race, and military component (active or reserve). RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of soldiers screened positive for alcohol misuse. Compared with soldiers who screened negative, those who screened positive were more likely to have recently engaged in the following behaviors: drinking and driving (OR=4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.31-5.76), riding with a driver who had been drinking (OR=5.87, CI=4.99-6.91), reporting late or missing work because of a hangover (OR=9.24, CI=6.73-12.68), using illicit drugs (OR=4.97, CI=3.68-6.71), being referred to alcohol rehabilitation (OR=7.15, CI=4.84-10.58), and being convicted of driving under the influence (OR=4.84, CI=3.04-7.67). CONCLUSIONS: Positive responses to a two-item alcohol screening tool were strongly associated with serious alcohol-related behaviors. This study highlights the need to improve screening and access to care for alcohol-related problems among service members returning from combat deployments.
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; Deborah W Garnick; Alex H S Harris; Elizabeth L Merrick; Keith Hofmann; Wendy Funk; Thomas V Williams; Mary Jo Larson Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; Mary Jo Larson; John D Corrigan; Grant A Ritter; Constance M Horgan; Robert M Bray; Thomas V Williams Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: David S Fink; Katherine M Keyes; Joseph R Calabrese; Israel Liberzon; Marijo B Tamburrino; Gregory H Cohen; Laura Sampson; Sandro Galea Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mary Jo Larson; Beth A Mohr; Rachel Sayko Adams; Nikki R Wooten; Thomas V Williams Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mohammad H Afzali; Matthew Sunderland; Philip J Batterham; Natacha Carragher; Alison Calear; Tim Slade Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; John D Corrigan; Beth A Mohr; Thomas V Williams; Mary Jo Larson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; Mary Jo Larson; John D Corrigan; Grant A Ritter; Thomas V Williams Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Thomas O Walton; Denise D Walker; Debra L Kaysen; Roger A Roffman; Lyungai Mbilinyi; Clayton Neighbors Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.164