Literature DB >> 20513227

What can actigraphy add to the concept of labschool design in clinical trials?

Henrik Uebel1, Björn Albrecht, Roumen Kirov, Alexander Heise, Manfred Döpfner, Franz Joseph Freisleder, Wolff Dieter Gerber, Michael Günter, Frank Hässler, Claudia Ose, Fritz Poustka, Roland Fischer, Tobias Banaschewski, Aribert Rothenberger.   

Abstract

Pharmacological intervention with methylphenidate (MPH) is very common and helpful in the treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It ameliorates inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity and improves psychosocial functioning. The core symptoms of ADHD are problematic mainly in demanding structured situations such as in the classroom. It was argued that MPH does not only lead to a decrease of hyperactivity in these situations but may also result in a general dampening of motor activity during non-structured leisure time. Unfortunately, only few clinical trials have investigated this practically important issue and thus it is still a matter of debate. It follows that many parents hesitate to accept psychotropic drugs for their children. To elucidate this problem in the current study, not only overall behavioral ratings (half-day blocks) but also day-long actigraphy was applied during an analogue classroom setting, where structured and non-structured situations alternated over time. Fourty-nine children with ADHD were assessed for treatment effects of once-daily extended-release and twice daily immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH) as well as placebo. Both MPH regimes yielded improved behavioral ratings during morning and afternoon, while actigraphy showed reduced motor activity in structured situations, but not during leisure time. Furthermore, the movement information obtained with actigraphy during structured situations could be differentiated from the one gained with overall behavioral ratings. Thus, while behavioral ratings provide a valid estimate of the overall symptomatology, additional information gathered with actigraphy may help to differentiate the impact of medication on hyperactive movement in different situations during the day. This may reflect a more valid picture of a child's real life and improve the quality of clinical trials. Thus, both methods may be regarded as complementary for the assessment of drug effects in children with ADHD and should be a standard of further laboratory school protocols in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513227     DOI: 10.2174/138161210791959845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  3 in total

Review 1.  Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Ole Jakob Storebø; Erica Ramstad; Helle B Krogh; Trine Danvad Nilausen; Maria Skoog; Mathilde Holmskov; Susanne Rosendal; Camilla Groth; Frederik L Magnusson; Carlos R Moreira-Maia; Donna Gillies; Kirsten Buch Rasmussen; Dorothy Gauci; Morris Zwi; Richard Kirubakaran; Bente Forsbøl; Erik Simonsen; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 2.  Enhanced Physical Activity Improves Selected Outcomes in Children With ADHD: Systematic Review.

Authors:  MinKyoung Song; Deborah Lauseng; Soohee Lee; Megan Nordstrom; Victor Katch
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  Continuous performance task in ADHD: Is reaction time variability a key measure?

Authors:  Florence Levy; Andrew Pipingas; Elizabeth V Harris; Maree Farrow; Richard B Silberstein
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.570

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.