Literature DB >> 20513162

A cost-consequence analysis of pregabalin versus usual care in the symptomatic treatment of refractory low back pain: sub-analysis of observational trial data from orthopaedic surgery and rehabilitation clinics.

Carles Morera-Domínguez1, Félix Ceberio-Balda, Mariano Flórez-García, Xavier Masramón, Vanessa López-Gómez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: low back pain is one of the most common reasons for outpatient consultation in both the primary-care and specialized-care settings. However, few studies have explored the effect of pregabalin in this context.
OBJECTIVE: to prospectively analyse the effect of adding pregabalin on costs and consequences in the treatment of refractory low back pain in routine medical practice.
METHODS: a secondary analysis was carried out in patients aged >or=18 years with a 6-month history of chronic refractory low back pain who had participated in a previous prospective, naturalistic, 12-week, two-visit study (RADIO study). The analysis compared patients receiving pregabalin with those receiving usual care. Severity of pain, healthcare resources utilization, lost workday equivalents due to pain, and related cost-adjusted reductions were assessed. The year of costing for all cost data reported in the study was 2007.
RESULTS: data from a total of 683 patients (49.5% women, mean age 55.0 years), 82.6% of whom were receiving pregabalin, were analysed. Pregabalin was associated with a higher covariable-adjusted reduction in severity of pain, i.e. mean (SD) -3.4 (2.0) compared with -2.0 (2.1) points with usual care on a 10-point neuropathic pain questionnaire (p < 0.001), and a 61.6% response rate (defined as >/=50% reduction in pain from baseline) compared with 37.3% with usual care (p < 0.001). This resulted in fewer lost workday equivalents in the pregabalin group versus usual care (27.8 vs 34.6, p = 0.002), which produced more significant adjusted reductions in indirect costs, i.e. mean (SD) -euro961.8 (euro1242.9) compared with -euro625.8 (euro1169.2) with usual care (p = 0.004). The cost of pregabalin, i.e. mean (SD) euro303.8 (euro175.8) compared with euro37.1 (euro97.0) for usual care (p < 0.001), was offset by larger reductions in the other cost components. While the adjusted total costs were substantially reduced in both groups, pregabalin-treated patients showed more significant reductions, i.e. mean (SD) -euro991.5 (euro1702.3) compared with -euro579.3 (euro2410.3) with usual care (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: compared with usual care, addition of pregabalin to existing therapy for refractory low back pain was associated with a larger reduction in pain severity and lost workday equivalents. The acquisition cost of pregabalin was offset by a higher reduction in the indirect components of cost, resulting in a significant decrease in total costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513162     DOI: 10.2165/11536280-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  37 in total

Review 1.  Naturalistic study designs in samples with refractory pain: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Rollin M Gallagher
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  [Prevalence of neuropathic pain in Spain: clinical, working and health care implications].

Authors:  Rafael Gálvez; Javier Rejas; María Pérez; Margarita Gómez
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Health and quality of life associated with chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin in the community.

Authors:  Blair H Smith; Nicola Torrance; Michael I Bennett; Amanda J Lee
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population.

Authors:  Roger Webb; Therese Brammah; Mark Lunt; Michelle Urwin; Tim Allison; Deborah Symmons
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Efficacy and safety of pregabalin in treatment refractory patients with various neuropathic pain entities in clinical routine.

Authors:  R Freynhagen; S Grond; G Schüpfer; A Hagebeuker; M Schmelz; D Ziegler; H-J Von Giesen; U Junker; K J Wagner; C Konrad
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Pregabalin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Julio Rosenstock; Michael Tuchman; Linda LaMoreaux; Uma Sharma
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Unmet needs in the management of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Norman Harden; Mitchell Cohen
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 8.  [Pregabalin. A new treatment for neuropathic pain].

Authors:  J López-Trigo; J Sancho Rieger
Journal:  Neurologia       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  Didier Bouhassira; Nadine Attal; Jacques Fermanian; Haiel Alchaar; Michèle Gautron; Etienne Masquelier; Sylvie Rostaing; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Elisabeth Collin; Jacques Grisart; François Boureau
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes associated to a neuropathic or somatic component.

Authors:  Concepcion Perez; Rafael Galvez; Silvia Huelbes; Joaquin Insausti; Didier Bouhassira; Silvia Diaz; Javier Rejas
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological management of chronic lower back pain: a review of cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Marion Haas; Richard De Abreu Lourenco
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Add-on treatment with pregabalin for patients with uncontrolled neuropathic pain who have been referred to pain clinics.

Authors:  José-Luis de la Calle; José De Andres; María Pérez; Vanessa López
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Reproducibility of a battery of human evoked pain models to detect pharmacological effects of analgesic drugs.

Authors:  Pieter S Siebenga; Guido van Amerongen; Pieter Okkerse; William S Denney; Pinky Dua; Richard P Butt; Justin L Hay; Geert J Groeneveld
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Spine Diseases: A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter Observational Studies in Japan.

Authors:  Toshihiko Taguchi; Shogo Nakano; Kazutaka Nozawa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  The effectiveness of pregabalin with or without agomelatine in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Mani Mahdavi; Behnam Shariati; Mohammadreza Shalbafan; Vahid Rashedi; Masoomeh Yarahmadi; Alireza Ghaznavi; Shayan Amiri
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.605

6.  Effectiveness of pregabalin for the treatment of chronic low back pain with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component): a non-interventional study in Japan.

Authors:  Toshihiko Taguchi; Ataru Igarashi; Stephen Watt; Bruce Parsons; Alesia Sadosky; Kazutaka Nozawa; Kazuhiro Hayakawa; Tamotsu Yoshiyama; Nozomi Ebata; Koichi Fujii
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Pregabalin in neuropathic pain: evidences and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Nirmal Singh; Amteshwar Singh Jaggi
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of pregabalin for treatment of chronic low back pain in patients with accompanying lower limb pain (neuropathic component) in Japan.

Authors:  Ataru Igarashi; Manabu Akazawa; Tatsunori Murata; Toshihiko Taguchi; Alesia Sadosky; Nozomi Ebata; Richard Willke; Koichi Fujii; Jim Doherty; Makoto Kobayashi
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-10-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.