PURPOSE: To validate an unspoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence with dual echo acquisition as a means to increase temperature sensitivity while monitoring intradiscal laser ablation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom experiments as well as in vitro thermal ablation simulations were performed in an open 1.0T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Three methods of noninvasive MR-thermometry based on the signal void decrease caused by T1-relaxation time increase (T1), the temperature-dependent proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift, and a combination of both methods with complex differences (CD) were compared. Temperature accuracy and reliability of temperature distribution were the main assessment criteria. RESULTS: The optimum temperature sensitivity was found using CD in phantom experiments. During in vitro experiments the PRF showed the smallest margin of error (T1: +/-1.64 degrees C, PRF: +/-1.23 degrees C, CD: +/-1.29 degrees C) and the best qualitative evaluation of temperature. CONCLUSION: Intradiscal temperature monitoring with an unspoiled dual-echo sequence is most accurate with PRF-thermometry in combination with the long echo time. Magnitude images with an initial short echo time permit high image detail of the heat-induced lesion.
PURPOSE: To validate an unspoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence with dual echo acquisition as a means to increase temperature sensitivity while monitoring intradiscal laser ablation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom experiments as well as in vitro thermal ablation simulations were performed in an open 1.0T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Three methods of noninvasive MR-thermometry based on the signal void decrease caused by T1-relaxation time increase (T1), the temperature-dependent proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift, and a combination of both methods with complex differences (CD) were compared. Temperature accuracy and reliability of temperature distribution were the main assessment criteria. RESULTS: The optimum temperature sensitivity was found using CD in phantom experiments. During in vitro experiments the PRF showed the smallest margin of error (T1: +/-1.64 degrees C, PRF: +/-1.23 degrees C, CD: +/-1.29 degrees C) and the best qualitative evaluation of temperature. CONCLUSION: Intradiscal temperature monitoring with an unspoiled dual-echo sequence is most accurate with PRF-thermometry in combination with the long echo time. Magnitude images with an initial short echo time permit high image detail of the heat-induced lesion.
Authors: Florian Streitparth; Tony Hartwig; Thula Walter; Maximilian De Bucourt; Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Tina Bretschneider; Patrick Freyhardt; Martin Maurer; Diane Renz; Bernhard Gebauer; Bernd Hamm; Ulf K M Teichgräber Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Georg Böning; Tony Hartwig; Patrick Freyhardt; Maximilian de Bucourt; Ulf Teichgräber; Florian Streitparth Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-07